Poland Awards Contract for Five Automated Border Control Gates at Warsaw Chopin Airport
29 Oct 2026
Standfirst Poland’s Mazowiecki Voivodeship Office in Warsaw has awarded a contract to Enigma Systemy Ochrony Informacji Sp. z o.o. for five automated border control gates intended for the Warsaw-Okęcie Border Guard Post at Warsaw Chopin Airport. The procurement covers the equipment, software licences, installation, integration, testing, training and warranty-period support. The winning tender was valued at PLN 2,565,000, while the award notice separately reports a total value of PLN 3,862,200 for all contracts awarded under the notice. Introduction Poland has awarded a public procurement contract for the replacement and commissioning of five automated border control gates, known as ABC gates, at the Warsaw-Okęcie Border Guard Post. The contract combines the supply of security equipment with software, technical integration, installation, documentation, training and maintenance-related obligations. The contracting authority is Mazowiecki Urząd Wojewódzki w Warszawie, or the Mazowiecki Voivodeship Office in Warsaw. The successful tenderer is Enigma Systemy Ochrony Informacji Sp. z o.o., a company registered in Warsaw. According to the award notice, the winner was selected on 23 October 2026 and the contract was concluded on 27 October 2026. Published in the Official Journal of the European Union's Supplement, issue 210/2026, on 29 October 2026, the result notice provides details of the procurement scope, award criteria and implementation requirements. The project is classified under CPV code 35120000, covering surveillance and security systems and devices. The contract is relevant to suppliers of border security equipment, biometric verification technology, security software, systems integration and technical support services. It also illustrates how public-sector equipment procurement can include a substantial delivery and integration component rather than being limited to the purchase of hardware. Why This Contract Matters Automated border control infrastructure combines physical equipment with software and identity-verification functions. The Polish procurement specifically requires the supplied gates to support border clearance using facial-image verification and fingerprint verification. A test set must also be provided to simulate the border clearance process. The contract's scope extends to the replacement of existing gates, connection of the supplied software to the Border Guard's border clearance system, technical documentation, staff training and support during the warranty period. These requirements make implementation, compatibility and service delivery important parts of the overall assignment. For procurement professionals, the award provides a practical example of a public authority specifying a complete operational solution. Suppliers must consider not only equipment pricing but also installation planning, software licensing, system integration, training, maintenance and the ability to complete the work within the prescribed timeframe. Contract Timeline The notice identifies the following key dates and implementation requirements: 8 September 2026: The procurement information specified a mandatory site visit at Warsaw Chopin Airport, scheduled for 10:00 local time. The site visit was required for participating contractors. 23 October 2026: Enigma Systemy Ochrony Informacji Sp. z o.o. was selected as the winner. 27 October 2026: Contract UMOWA NR 486/2026/WIR was concluded. 28 October 2026: The award notice was dispatched for publication. 29 October 2026: The contract award result was published in OJ S 210/2026 under notice number 752474-2026. 60 calendar days: The stated maximum delivery and implementation period runs from the date of contract conclusion. The notice states that a shorter completion period was rewarded under the tender evaluation criteria. It does not provide a confirmed final commissioning date or a separate completion certificate. Contract Overview The procurement concerns the purchase, delivery, installation and commissioning of five new automated border control gates for the Warsaw-Okęcie Border Guard Post. It is a supplies contract awarded through an open procedure and governed by the legal framework identified in the notice as Directive 2014/24/EU. The contract includes associated equipment, licences and software, a test set for simulating border clearance, removal of the five existing gates and installation of the replacements. It also includes documentation, possible software adaptation to connect with the Border Guard's clearance system, transfer of specified economic copyrights, training and warranty-period technical support. The place of performance is Warsaw, Poland, identified by NUTS code PL911. The procurement is not financed by European Union funds. The notice states that it is covered by the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA). Key Contract Details Notice number752474-2026 PublicationOJ S 210/2026, 29 October 2026 Contracting authorityMazowiecki Urząd Wojewódzki w Warszawie Winning supplierEnigma Systemy Ochrony Informacji Sp. z o.o. Contract identifierUMOWA NR 486/2026/WIR Contract subjectPurchase, delivery, installation and commissioning of five automated border control gates Winning tender valuePLN 2,565,000 Total value of all contracts reported in the noticePLN 3,862,200 Winner selected23 October 2026 Contract concluded27 October 2026 Maximum implementation period60 calendar days from contract conclusion ProcedureOpen procedure Contract classificationSupplies Main CPV code35120000 – Surveillance and security systems and devices Place of performanceWarsaw, Poland (PL911) EU fundingNo EU funds Framework agreementNo Dynamic purchasing systemNo The two reported monetary figures should not be treated as interchangeable. The notice identifies PLN 2,565,000 as the value of the winning tender and PLN 3,862,200 as the value of all contracts awarded under the notice. It does not explain the difference in the available result fields. Project Scope The successful contractor is responsible for delivering an operational solution rather than supplying standalone equipment. The published description identifies the principal work packages as follows. Supply of five ABC gates: Provide five new automated border control gates, including required peripheral equipment and other elements specified in the procurement description. Software and licences: Supply the required software and licences under the terms set out in the procurement documents. Testing capability: Provide a test set that can simulate border clearance and test facial-image and fingerprint verification using the supplied gates. Replacement and installation: Dismantle five existing gates and install five new gates at locations and times designated by the contracting authority and user. Documentation: Prepare and deliver the documentation required by the procurement specification. System integration: Adapt the supplied software to connect with the Border Guard's border clearance system, including a programming interface where applicable under the offer and procurement specification. Intellectual property: Transfer the specified economic copyrights to the contracting authority and the Border Guard in accordance with the contract and procurement documents. Warranty-period service: Provide technical support, service and technical and maintenance inspections in line with the manufacturer's guidance, at least once every six months during the warranty period. Training: Train Border Guard engineers in administration of the central software component and officers in proper operation and maintenance of the gates and their software. Software updates: Support the user with software updates during the warranty period when the manufacturer releases new software or versions. The contract description refers to the procurement specification, known as OPZ, in Annex 1 to the Polish tender specification (SWZ), and the draft contractual provisions (PPU) in Annex 2. The award notice does not reproduce the full technical specifications or warranty duration. About the Contracting Authority Mazowiecki Urząd Wojewódzki w Warszawie, the Mazowiecki Voivodeship Office in Warsaw, is the contracting authority named in the notice. It is classified as a central government authority, with general public services listed as its main activity. The office's address is Pl. Bankowy 3/5, 00-950 Warszawa, Poland. The notice lists the procurement contact email as przetarg@mazowieckie.pl and the telephone number as +48 22 695 60 61. The authority's official website is gov.pl/web/uw-mazowiecki. Its buyer profile is listed on the Polish e-Zamówienia platform at ezamowienia.gov.pl. The equipment is intended for use by the Border Guard at the Warsaw-Okęcie post. The notice identifies the Border Guard as the user involved in the operational requirements, training and system integration. About the Organisations Involved Enigma Systemy Ochrony Informacji Sp. z o.o. is the successful tenderer and the recorded winner for Lot LOT-0001. The notice classifies the company as a large economic operator and gives its registered location as Warsaw, Poland. Its winning tender was valued at PLN 2,565,000. The notice states that subcontracting was not planned. Mazowiecki Urząd Wojewódzki w Warszawie is the buyer responsible for the procurement. The contract requires coordination with the authority and the Border Guard over installation locations and timing, documentation, software integration, training and support. Krajowa Izba Odwoławcza is identified as the review organisation. The notice lists the body at ul. Postępu 17a, 02-676 Warszawa, Poland, with the email odwolania@uzp.gov.pl and telephone +48 22 4587801. It also sets out the applicable appeal deadlines. The award notice does not provide a detailed company profile, ownership information or project references for the winning supplier. Those details are therefore not inferred here. Procurement Analysis The procurement was conducted using an open procedure, with one lot covering the complete requirement for five gates. The notice records one tender received, including one electronic submission. It reports no tenders from small, micro or medium-sized tenderers, no tenders from other European Economic Area countries and no tenders from outside the EEA. The evaluation model assigned 60 points to price, 30 points to warranty and 10 points to the delivery period. Price was therefore the largest individual component, while warranty and implementation speed together accounted for 40% of the stated evaluation weighting. This weighting is relevant to suppliers preparing comparable bids. A competitive price alone was not the only stated consideration: warranty commitments and the time needed to complete the project also contributed to the score. The award notice does not publish the detailed scoring of the winning offer or the warranty period offered by the supplier. The mandatory site visit was another significant procedural requirement. The notice states that a bid submitted without participation in the site visit would be rejected under Article 226(1)(18) of Poland's Public Procurement Law. The requirement indicates that suppliers were expected to understand the physical installation environment before submitting an offer. Because only one tender was recorded, the result provides limited evidence about the breadth of competition or the range of prices that might have emerged under a larger field of bidders. It does establish that the contract was awarded and concluded with Enigma Systemy Ochrony Informacji Sp. z o.o. Additional Procurement Facts The procedure identifier is 1cae92df-11f7-4356-a205-0f16228885c6, while the internal reference is BOU-V.272.62.2026. The preceding notice is identified as 609264-2026. The contract is not a framework agreement and does not use a dynamic purchasing system. The notice states that the procurement is covered by the Government Procurement Agreement but is not financed with EU funds. For review purposes, the notice gives two general appeal periods: 10 days from transmission of information about the challenged contracting-authority action when that information is communicated electronically, or 15 days when it is transmitted by other means. Suppliers should consult the applicable rules and official procurement documents for the precise circumstances governing any appeal. The result notice was officially available in Polish. Its publication date was 29 October 2026, following dispatch on 28 October 2026. Market and Industry Perspective The award falls within the market for security systems and devices, with a specific focus on automated border clearance. Its requirements bring together physical access-control equipment, biometric verification, software licensing, integration with an existing government system and ongoing technical support. For suppliers in this field, the procurement illustrates the importance of demonstrating compatibility with operational systems as well as the ability to install and commission equipment in a controlled airport environment. Test equipment, technical documentation and user training are also part of the deliverable, not optional additions described separately from the core supply. The contract's implementation window and site-access arrangements may be particularly relevant to bidders working at operational transport facilities. Installation planning must account for the locations and timing designated by the authority and user, as well as the requirement to remove the existing gates and install their replacements. The award does not establish a broader market trend or reveal demand at other Polish airports. It is a specific procurement for five gates at one Border Guard post. Any wider assessment of future demand would require additional procurement notices or official investment plans. Economic Significance The award represents a public-sector purchase that combines equipment expenditure with software, installation, integration, training and warranty support. The winning tender value recorded in the result is PLN 2,565,000. The notice separately records PLN 3,862,200 as the total value of all contracts awarded in the notice, without explaining the difference between the figures. For the supplier, the contract entails delivery and service obligations within a defined implementation period. For the public buyer, the scope brings several related components under one contract, including equipment replacement, software integration and the transfer of specified economic copyrights. The procurement is not EU-funded according to the notice. It is nevertheless reported as covered by the Government Procurement Agreement. The published information does not quantify wider economic effects, job creation or any savings expected from the new equipment, so no such claims can be made from the award record alone. Future Procurement Opportunities The notice does not announce a follow-on contract, expansion programme or planned procurement of additional automated border control gates. Suppliers should therefore avoid treating this award as confirmation of further orders at Warsaw Chopin Airport. Potential future opportunities may be identified by monitoring procurement notices from Polish public authorities and border security organisations. Relevant areas to watch include border control equipment, biometric verification, software integration, maintenance, system upgrades and technical training. These are areas connected to the scope of this contract, rather than confirmed future purchases. Suppliers can monitor current tender notices on Polandtenders and review published contract awards to identify related procurement activity. Opportunities for Suppliers Although the contract has already been awarded, its requirements provide useful reference points for businesses considering similar public-sector opportunities. Security equipment manufacturers: Suppliers of automated gates and associated peripherals may find comparable requirements in border, airport and controlled-access environments. Biometric technology providers: Facial-image and fingerprint verification are explicit elements of the testing and operational requirements. Software and integration companies: Compatibility with existing government clearance systems and the possible development of a programming interface are important parts of the specification. Technical service providers: Warranty support, periodic inspections, maintenance and software-update assistance form part of the delivery obligations. Training specialists: The contract distinguishes between technical administration training for engineers and operational training for Border Guard officers. For future tenders, prospective bidders should examine the complete procurement specification and contractual provisions, assess the site-access requirements, confirm software and hardware compatibility, and plan the delivery schedule before pricing the work. The Polish notice demonstrates that a mandatory site visit can be a condition of bid eligibility, so suppliers must check such requirements carefully. Businesses interested in tender monitoring can register with Polandtenders or log in to access the service. Further assistance is available through the Polandtenders contact page. What Businesses Should Watch Suppliers tracking similar contracts should pay attention to several practical indicators in future notices: Mandatory site inspections: Confirm whether a site visit is compulsory, how attendance must be registered and what access documentation is required. Implementation deadlines: Check whether the completion period begins at contract signature and whether shorter delivery receives additional evaluation points. Warranty scoring: Review how warranty duration or service commitments are weighted and what maintenance frequency is required. System integration: Identify required interfaces, compatibility obligations, software licences and ownership provisions for developed or adapted software. Training and support: Establish the separate training requirements for administrators and operational users, alongside post-installation support obligations. Competition levels: Review the number and types of bids reported in award notices, while recognising that a single tender does not by itself explain why participation was limited. Reported contract values: Distinguish the winning tender value from any aggregate value shown elsewhere in the notice, and seek clarification where the source does not explain the difference. These checks can help suppliers evaluate technical feasibility, compliance risk and the full cost of delivering an integrated security system. Polandtenders Procurement Intelligence This award highlights how public procurement intelligence can support more than the identification of a contract's headline value. The detailed requirements show the relationship between equipment supply, software integration, testing, staff training and warranty support. For suppliers monitoring the security and border technology market, the award record provides identifiable signals: the buyer's name, the successful supplier, the main CPV code, the procurement method, the implementation deadline and the award criteria. These details can be used to organise searches for comparable notices and track activity by purchasing authority or procurement category. The recorded single-tender outcome is also useful context, although it should not be interpreted as proof of insufficient competition or as a prediction of future award conditions. The source does not provide the winning supplier's detailed evaluation score or a breakdown of the difference between the reported tender value and total notice value. Businesses can use Polandtenders's tender search to monitor new opportunities and its contract award section to review published procurement results. Supplier Takeaways Poland awarded the contract for five automated border control gates at the Warsaw-Okęcie Border Guard Post to Enigma Systemy Ochrony Informacji Sp. z o.o. The winning tender value was PLN 2,565,000, while the notice separately reports a total award value of PLN 3,862,200. The contract includes equipment, software licences, testing facilities, installation, system integration, documentation, training and warranty-period support. The maximum implementation period is 60 calendar days from contract conclusion. The evaluation criteria assigned 60 points to price, 30 to warranty and 10 to delivery time. One tender was received for the lot, according to the award notice. The mandatory site visit was stated as a bid requirement, making advance compliance checks essential for similar procurements. The notice identifies no EU funding, confirms GPA coverage and reports no subcontracting by the winning tenderer. Key Takeaways Buyer: Mazowiecki Voivodeship Office in Warsaw. Winner: Enigma Systemy Ochrony Informacji Sp. z o.o. Project: Purchase, delivery, installation and commissioning of five automated border control gates. Location: Warsaw-Okęcie Border Guard Post, Warsaw, Poland. Winning tender: PLN 2,565,000. Reported total award value: PLN 3,862,200, with no explanation of the difference from the winning tender value in the notice. Delivery period: Maximum 60 calendar days from contract conclusion. Evaluation: Price 60 points, warranty 30 points and delivery time 10 points. Competition: One tender recorded. Conclusion Poland's award for five automated border control gates at Warsaw Chopin Airport is a defined security technology procurement combining hardware, biometric verification, software integration and operational support. Enigma Systemy Ochrony Informacji Sp. z o.o. was selected on 23 October 2026, and the contract was concluded on 27 October 2026, with a maximum implementation period of 60 calendar days. For suppliers, the procurement demonstrates the importance of preparing a complete technical and service solution, meeting site-visit requirements and addressing delivery time and warranty commitments in the bid. The notice also records only one tender and reports two different monetary figures for the winning tender and the total value of contracts awarded. Those details should be retained accurately when using the award as a procurement intelligence reference. Businesses seeking comparable opportunities can follow new tender notices, review contract award results and use Polandtenders to monitor relevant public procurement activity. Source Official TED contract award notice: 752474-2026 – Poland: Surveillance and security systems and devices. Published in OJ S 210/2026 on 29 October 2026. Contracting authority: Mazowiecki Voivodeship Office in Warsaw. Buyer profile: Polish e-Zamówienia platform.
View Details
Poland Closes Volkswagen Military Vehicle Repair Tender in Gdańsk Without Selecting a Winner
28 Oct 2026
Standfirst Poland's State Treasury Military Unit No. 2305 has closed a procurement for maintenance and repair services for Volkswagen vehicles in Gdańsk without selecting a winner. The award notice cites the absence of suitable tenders in a previous procurement as the justification for using a negotiated procedure without a prior call for competition. However, the result recorded for the lot shows zero tenders received and no successful supplier. Published on 28 October 2026, the notice provides no awarded contract value or confirmed repair provider. Introduction A Polish defence procurement for maintenance and repair services for Volkswagen vehicles in Gdańsk has been closed without a winner, according to a contract result notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 28 October 2026. The contracting authority is Skarb Państwa - Jednostka Wojskowa Nr 2305, or the State Treasury's Military Unit No. 2305. The authority's main activity is defence, and the procurement concerns servicing and repair work for Volkswagen vehicles in Gdańsk, Poland. The notice, numbered 746721-2026, records no winner for lot LOT-0003 and states that the competition is closed. Its result section reports zero tenders received. It also identifies the absence of suitable tenders, requests to participate or applications in response to a previous notice as the justification for the procurement approach. The procedure is recorded as a negotiated procedure without a prior call for competition. The notice cites Article 214(1)(6) of Poland's Public Procurement Law of 11 September 2019 as the national legal basis for the stated justification, referring to circumstances in which an earlier open or restricted procedure did not produce eligible applications or acceptable tenders and the original contract conditions were not substantially changed. The published record does not identify a successful supplier, report an awarded value or provide a new contract conclusion date. It is therefore a notice of an unsuccessful procurement result, not a completed award to a vehicle maintenance company. Why This Contract Matters Vehicle maintenance is an operational requirement for organisations that rely on transport assets. For a defence authority, maintenance and repair services can be part of the support needed to keep vehicles available for their intended duties. This procurement concerned Volkswagen vehicles in Gdańsk, although the notice does not specify the number of vehicles, their models, their operational roles or the particular repairs required. The result is notable because the procurement closed without selecting a supplier. The notice records zero tenders for the lot, while its direct-award justification refers to the lack of suitable submissions in an earlier procurement. This highlights the distinction between the justification for using a particular procedure and the result of the procurement reported in the notice. For suppliers, the case demonstrates the importance of identifying why a contracting authority has moved to a negotiated procedure without a prior competition notice. The published information does not disclose the details of the earlier procedure, the specific deficiencies in any previous submissions or the reasons that no tenders were recorded for the present lot. The notice also does not establish whether the authority will launch a replacement procurement, amend its requirements or use another route to secure maintenance services. Those outcomes remain unconfirmed. Contract Timeline The notice provides the publication and procedure information below, but does not give a date for a contract award or signing because no winner was selected. Previous procurement: The notice cites the absence of suitable tenders, requests to participate or applications in response to a previous notice as the justification for the procedure. The date and reference number of that earlier procurement are not specified in the result notice. Procurement identifier: The procedure is recorded under internal identifier ZP-28/2026. Lot identifier: The lot is identified as LOT-0003, with the lot-level internal identifier ZP-11/2026. 27 October 2026: The result notice was dispatched for publication. 28 October 2026: Notice 746721-2026 was published in OJ S 209/2026. The notice lists a 12-month duration for the lot, but because no winner was selected and no contract award is reported, this should not be read as confirmation that a 12-month service contract began. Contract Overview The procurement title in Polish is “Wykonywanie usług obsługowo - naprawczych pojazdów marki VOLKSWAGEN w m. Gdańsk”. It refers to the performance of servicing and repair services for Volkswagen vehicles in Gdańsk. The contract is classified as a services procurement, with the main Common Procurement Vocabulary (CPV) code 50630000, covering repair and maintenance services of military vehicles. The place of performance is Gdańsk in the Gdański NUTS region of Poland. The buyer is Skarb Państwa - Jednostka Wojskowa Nr 2305, a public-law body whose stated main activity is defence. The notice lists the procurement under the standard public procurement regime and identifies Directive 2014/24/EU as the legal basis at the European level. The procedure field identifies a negotiated procedure without a prior call for competition. The results section separately labels the outcome as a direct award and cites the lack of suitable tenders or applications in the previous procedure as the justification. Nevertheless, the result for LOT-0003 explicitly states that no winner was chosen and the competition was closed. No contract value, winning bid, successful supplier or contract conclusion date is provided for this lot. The notice therefore confirms the procurement's subject and unsuccessful result but does not establish the financial value of any completed award. Key Contract Details Notice number746721-2026 Publication date28 October 2026 Official Journal referenceOJ S 209/2026 CountryPoland Contracting authoritySkarb Państwa - Jednostka Wojskowa Nr 2305 Procurement subjectMaintenance and repair services for Volkswagen vehicles in Gdańsk Lot identifierLOT-0003 Procedure identifierZP-28/2026 Lot internal identifierZP-11/2026 Contract typeServices Procedure typeNegotiated without prior call for competition Main CPV code50630000: Repair and maintenance services of military vehicles Place of performanceGdańsk, Poland Listed lot duration12 months Award criterionPrice, weighted at 100% ResultNo winner selected; competition closed Tenders recorded for the lot0 Awarded valueNot stated; no winner selected EU fundingNot financed with EU funds GPA coverageNo Project Scope The published description is brief and identifies the required service as maintenance and repair work for Volkswagen vehicles in Gdańsk. The CPV classification places the procurement within repair and maintenance services for military vehicles. The result notice does not include a detailed technical specification. It does not state the number of vehicles to be serviced, the vehicle models or ages, the expected volume of repairs, the maintenance schedule or whether services were to be performed at a military facility or a contractor's workshop. It also does not provide specific service-level requirements, response times, parts requirements, warranty conditions or a breakdown between routine maintenance and corrective repairs. Those details, if defined, would need to be checked in the original procurement documents. The lot record lists a duration of 12 months. However, because the result states that no winner was chosen and the competition was closed, the published duration should be understood as a procurement field rather than evidence of an active service agreement. About the Contracting Authority Skarb Państwa - Jednostka Wojskowa Nr 2305 is the contracting authority named in the notice. It is classified as a body governed by public law, with defence listed as its principal activity. The authority's public procurement department is identified as “Grupa ds. Zamówień Publicznych”. Its listed address is ul. Marsa 80, 04-520 Warszawa, Poland. The procurement contact email is 2305.zamowienia@ron.mil.pl, and the telephone number provided is +48 261895027. The notice lists the authority's website as www.grom.wp.mil.pl. It also provides a procurement information exchange endpoint at portal.smartpzp.pl/jw2305 and a buyer profile at platformazakupowa.pl. The authority is listed as the organisation providing additional information about the procurement procedure. The notice does not name a maintenance company as a successful contractor, because no winner was selected for the lot. About the Organisations Involved Skarb Państwa - Jednostka Wojskowa Nr 2305: The buyer and defence authority responsible for the procurement. The notice identifies its public procurement department and provides its contact information in Warsaw. It is the organisation associated with the unsuccessful lot. Krajowa Izba Odwoławcza: Poland's National Appeals Chamber is listed as both the review and mediation organisation. It is also identified as the organisation providing further information on review procedures. The notice explains that remedies available during the procurement process include an appeal to the chamber and a complaint to a regional court, subject to the terms and deadlines set out in Polish public procurement law. Publications Office of the European Union: The Publications Office is identified in the notice as the TED eSender. Its role in the record concerns the publication system rather than delivery of the vehicle maintenance services. No successful supplier is identified in the notice. The result section explicitly records that no winner was chosen, so there is no awarded contractor profile or successful tender value to report. Procurement Analysis The procurement record contains several details that are important for interpreting the outcome accurately. The procedure type is shown as a negotiated procedure without a prior call for competition. The results section also identifies the procurement as a direct award and gives the absence of suitable submissions in an earlier procedure as its justification. The national legal justification cites Article 214(1)(6) of Poland's Public Procurement Law of 11 September 2019. The text supplied in the notice describes circumstances in which an authority may use a negotiated procedure without publication if an earlier open or restricted procedure received no participation applications, or if applications or tenders were rejected on the specified statutory grounds, provided the original contract conditions were not substantially changed. This explanation relates to the legal justification for the procurement approach. It does not mean that a supplier was ultimately selected in the result being reported. For LOT-0003, the notice states that no winner was chosen and the competition was closed. The lot's stated award criterion was price at 100%. This means price was identified as the sole award criterion in the published lot record. However, the notice reports zero tenders received for the lot, so it does not provide a price comparison, winning price or evidence of a price-based selection among bids. The notice includes two internal identifiers: ZP-28/2026 for the procedure and ZP-11/2026 for the lot. These are reproduced as recorded and should not be treated as identical identifiers. The record also lists a 12-month duration without reporting an award or contract conclusion date. The duration therefore cannot be used to infer that a service contract was signed or commenced. Additional Procurement Facts European legal basis: Directive 2014/24/EU. National legal reference: Article 214(1)(6) of Poland's Public Procurement Law of 11 September 2019, as cited in the notice. Procedure: Negotiated procedure without a prior call for competition. Direct-award justification: No suitable tenders, requests to participate or applications were received in response to a previous notice, according to the published justification field. Lot result: No winner selected; the competition is closed. Submission statistics: The lot result lists zero tenders, including zero electronic tenders and zero tenders in the other submission categories shown. Contract value: No awarded value is stated. Contract duration field: 12 months. Framework agreement: No framework agreement is recorded. Dynamic purchasing system: No dynamic purchasing system is recorded. EU funding: The procurement is not financed with EU funds. Government Procurement Agreement: The notice states that the procurement is not covered by the GPA. Strategic procurement: No strategic procurement objective is recorded. Green public procurement: No green public procurement criteria are recorded. Review organisation: Krajowa Izba Odwoławcza. Market and Industry Perspective The procurement falls within the market for vehicle servicing and repair, with a specific focus on military vehicle maintenance. Such services can involve workshop capacity, vehicle diagnostics, repair expertise and access to appropriate replacement parts. However, the published notice does not set out the detailed technical or commercial requirements for this particular procurement. The absence of a selected winner means the result does not identify a supplier that secured the work or establish a contract price against which other maintenance providers can benchmark their offers. It also does not provide enough information to conclude whether the lack of a winner resulted from the technical scope, commercial conditions, supplier availability or another factor. The stated use of a negotiated procedure without a prior call for competition is relevant to suppliers tracking public-sector opportunities. The justification field points to a previous procedure that did not produce suitable submissions. The notice does not include enough information to assess the earlier competition's participation levels or the reasons particular submissions may have been unsuitable. For businesses monitoring defence-related vehicle maintenance opportunities, the main takeaway is procedural rather than commercial: the requirement was published as an unsuccessful result, and the notice does not confirm that the service has been awarded to any company. Economic Significance The notice does not disclose an estimated contract value, a winning bid amount or a final contract price for LOT-0003. As a result, the financial scale of the maintenance requirement cannot be reliably quantified from the published result alone. The absence of a reported value also prevents a meaningful comparison between the procurement and other vehicle maintenance contracts. No supplier revenue, expenditure commitment or confirmed contract duration can be attributed to a successful award on the basis of this notice. Although the lot information lists a 12-month duration, the result explicitly states that no winner was chosen and the competition was closed. It would therefore be inaccurate to treat the stated duration as evidence of a signed contract or to calculate a monthly contract value from it. The potential economic implications for the authority depend on what happens next, such as whether another procurement is launched or another lawful route is pursued. The notice does not announce a follow-up procurement or confirm any replacement arrangement. Future Procurement Opportunities The result notice does not announce a new tender, a revised competition or a planned re-publication of the requirement. Suppliers should therefore not interpret it as an open invitation to submit offers. Businesses that provide vehicle servicing, repair, diagnostics or fleet maintenance services may nevertheless monitor future notices from the authority and other public-sector buyers. Relevant opportunities may be published under CPV code 50630000 or related classifications, depending on the specific scope of each procurement. For any future competition, suppliers should review the complete procurement documents to determine the vehicles covered, the technical requirements, service locations, delivery times, parts arrangements, eligibility conditions and evaluation methodology. Those details cannot be established from the present result notice. Businesses can review current procurement notices through Polandtenders's tender listings and monitor completed procurement outcomes through the contract awards section. Opportunities for Suppliers Although this particular lot closed without a winner, the published record offers suppliers several practical points to consider when preparing for similar vehicle maintenance procurements. Review the scope carefully: Confirm which vehicles, locations and categories of maintenance are included in any future tender documentation. Check procedural notices: Where a notice refers to a previous unsuccessful procurement, review the available documents to understand the stated procedure and requirements. Prepare a compliant bid: Ensure the submission meets the formal requirements, eligibility conditions and technical specifications set by the authority. Assess pricing requirements: This lot listed price as the sole award criterion. Suppliers should check the actual pricing format and cost assumptions in any future procurement documents rather than infer them from this result. Monitor official procurement channels: Use the authority's listed procurement platform and other tender sources to check whether a new opportunity is published. Avoid assuming a contract is available: A result notice recording no winner is not an active tender notice. Suppliers seeking wider visibility into published public procurement notices can register with Polandtenders or log in to an existing account. For platform-related enquiries, they can use the Polandtenders contact page. What Businesses Should Watch Businesses tracking this procurement should distinguish between the legal justification for the procedure and the recorded result. The notice refers to an earlier procurement that did not produce suitable submissions, but the current lot result also records zero tenders and no selected winner. The published information does not explain the full sequence of events in the earlier procedure. Another point to monitor is whether the contracting authority publishes a replacement tender or a subsequent notice. No such follow-up is confirmed in the present record. Suppliers should rely on official publications rather than assume that the requirement will automatically return to the market. The internal identifiers also merit attention. The overall procedure is listed as ZP-28/2026, while the lot is associated with ZP-11/2026. These identifiers should be retained as published when searching for related documents or contacting the authority. Finally, the stated 12-month duration should not be interpreted as an active contract term. With no winner selected and no contract value reported, the notice does not establish that services have commenced or that a maintenance provider has been appointed. Polandtenders Procurement Intelligence This notice is an example of why procurement results must be interpreted separately from contract awards. Although it is published as a contract or concession award notice, the result for LOT-0003 records that no winner was selected and the competition was closed. The document provides no successful supplier or awarded value. The procedure record states that the authority used a negotiated procedure without a prior call for competition and cites the lack of suitable tenders or applications in an earlier procurement as the justification. That procedural explanation is important, but it does not establish that a contract was ultimately concluded. The 100% price criterion is another useful detail, although it should be read in context. Because the lot result records zero tenders received, the notice does not show a winning price or a competitive price comparison. For suppliers and procurement analysts, the key intelligence is the status of the requirement: the published result does not confirm an award. Monitoring subsequent notices from the contracting authority is necessary to determine whether the maintenance requirement is retendered or otherwise addressed. Readers can follow new opportunities through Polandtenders tender listings and use the contract awards database to distinguish successful awards from other procurement outcomes. Supplier Takeaways Poland's Military Unit No. 2305 published a result notice for Volkswagen vehicle maintenance and repair services in Gdańsk. The notice was published on 28 October 2026 as TED notice 746721-2026. The procurement was recorded as a negotiated procedure without a prior call for competition. The stated justification refers to the absence of suitable submissions in a previous procurement. The result for LOT-0003 states that no winner was selected and the competition was closed. The lot result records zero tenders received. The published notice does not identify a successful supplier or provide an awarded contract value. The lot lists a 12-month duration, but this does not confirm that a contract was signed or commenced. Price was recorded as the sole award criterion at 100%, but no winning price is reported. Suppliers should monitor official channels for any future procurement notice rather than treat this result as an open tender. Key Takeaways Procurement: Volkswagen vehicle maintenance and repair services in Gdańsk, Poland. Buyer: Skarb Państwa - Jednostka Wojskowa Nr 2305. Notice: 746721-2026, published 28 October 2026. Procedure: Negotiated without a prior call for competition. Outcome: No winner selected; the competition was closed. Submissions: Zero tenders recorded for the lot. Financial value: No awarded value stated. Duration field: 12 months, without confirmation of a signed contract. Next step for suppliers: Monitor official notices for any replacement or future procurement. Conclusion Poland's Military Unit No. 2305 has published an unsuccessful procurement result for Volkswagen vehicle maintenance and repair services in Gdańsk. TED notice 746721-2026 records that no winner was selected for LOT-0003 and that the competition was closed, with zero tenders received in the lot result. The notice cites the lack of suitable submissions in a previous procurement as the justification for using a negotiated procedure without a prior call for competition. However, it does not identify a successful supplier, provide an awarded value or confirm that a service contract was concluded. For vehicle maintenance businesses and procurement analysts, the notice provides information about the requirement and its procedural outcome, but not a live bidding opportunity. Any future opportunity will need to be confirmed through a subsequent official procurement publication. Source Official source: TED Contract Result Notice 746721-2026, “Wykonywanie usług obsługowo - naprawczych pojazdów marki VOLKSWAGEN w m. Gdańsk”, published in OJ S 209/2026 on 28 October 2026. Contracting authority: Skarb Państwa - Jednostka Wojskowa Nr 2305. Procurement email: 2305.zamowienia@ron.mil.pl. Buyer profile: platformazakupowa.pl. Procurement information exchange endpoint: portal.smartpzp.pl/jw2305.
View Details
Poland Awards PLN 2.94 Million Ammunition Supply Contract to Polish Innovation Labs
27 Oct 2026
Standfirst Poland’s military procurement unit, Jednostka Wojskowa 4724, has awarded a PLN 2,944,620 contract to Polish Innovation Labs sp. z o.o. for the supply of 5.56 × 45 mm ammunition with anti-ricochet projectiles. The procurement covers a base order of 400,000 rounds, with an option for up to 200,000 additional rounds. The contract was concluded on 21 October 2026 following a restricted defence procurement procedure. The award notice also records a procurement appeal involving the rejection of the successful bidder’s offer and the earlier selection of another supplier. Introduction Poland has awarded a military ammunition supply contract worth PLN 2,944,620 to Polish Innovation Labs sp. z o.o., according to a contract award notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union’s Supplement (OJ S) on 27 October 2026. The contracting authority is Jednostka Wojskowa 4724, a public-law body operating in the defence sector. The procurement concerns 5.56 × 45 mm ammunition fitted with anti-ricochet projectiles, with the contract allowing for the purchase of up to 600,000 rounds. The procurement is divided into a base requirement of 400,000 rounds and an optional quantity of up to 200,000 rounds. The option allows the authority to increase the quantity purchased under the contract, subject to the conditions specified in the procurement documents. The notice identifies the contract as number 76/2026 and records 6 October 2026 as the date the winner was selected. The contract was concluded on 21 October 2026. The award was conducted through a restricted procedure under the defence and security procurement framework. Why This Contract Matters The award provides a documented example of defence-related supply procurement in Poland, involving a defined ammunition specification, a substantial quantity and an option for additional purchases. The requirement for up to 600,000 rounds gives the contract a clear supply-chain dimension. Delivery must meet the authority’s technical, quality and documentation requirements, while the optional quantity introduces a potential variation in the final volume ordered. The notice also highlights the importance of procedural compliance in defence procurement. It records a review initiated by Polish Innovation Labs after its offer was rejected and another contractor, WORKS 11 sp. z o.o., was initially selected as the most advantageous bidder. The review decision is recorded as accepted. The current award notice subsequently identifies Polish Innovation Labs as the winning supplier. For suppliers, the case illustrates why bid preparation, technical compliance and the use of formal review mechanisms can be significant in restricted public procurement procedures. The notice does not, however, provide the full reasoning behind the review decision or explain every stage of the evaluation. Contract Timeline The published notice provides the following key dates: - Previous notice: Procurement notice 389027-2026. Appeal date: 13 August 2026, according to the review information. Winner selected: 6 October 2026. Contract concluded: 21 October 2026. Award notice dispatched: 26 October 2026. Award notice published: 27 October 2026. Recorded delivery period: Three months, with an end date of 20 November 2026. The notice identifies the contract duration as three months and lists 20 November 2026 as the end date. It does not separately state the precise date on which physical deliveries began.Contract Overview The contract, titled “Dostawa amunicji”, concerns the supply of 5.56 × 45 mm ammunition with anti-ricochet projectiles. Its main classification under the Common Procurement Vocabulary is CPV 35330000, covering ammunition. The procurement was handled as a restricted procedure and was not marked as accelerated. The legal basis cited in the notice is Directive 2009/81/EC, which covers defence and security procurement, alongside the relevant provisions of Poland’s Public Procurement Law. The authority did not permit partial tenders. Bidders were required to price the complete scope and identify the proposed goods clearly. The procurement documents also required bidders to complete a technical-parameters schedule and provide the documentation specified for delivery. The award notice records a winning tender value of PLN 2,944,620. It does not provide a separate estimated contract value, so a comparison between the winning price and an official estimate cannot be established from the notice alone. Key Contract Details Contracting authorityJednostka Wojskowa 4724 CountryPoland Contract titleDostawa amunicji Contract number76/2026 Procurement referenceZP/OiB/12/2026 TED notice number743495-2026 Publication date27 October 2026 Winning supplierPolish Innovation Labs sp. z o.o. Contract valuePLN 2,944,620 Product5.56 × 45 mm ammunition with anti-ricochet projectiles Base quantity400,000 rounds Optional quantityUp to 200,000 additional rounds Maximum stated quantityUp to 600,000 rounds CPV code35330000 – Ammunition ProcedureRestricted procedure Winner selected6 October 2026 Contract concluded21 October 2026 Recorded durationThree months, ending 20 November 2026 Tenders receivedThree Project Scope The contract covers the delivery of ammunition measuring 5.56 × 45 mm and fitted with anti-ricochet projectiles. According to the notice, the maximum quantity is 600,000 rounds, comprising 400,000 rounds under the base order and up to 200,000 rounds under an optional provision. The option is governed by the contract’s unit prices. If the authority exercises it, the supplier is entitled to additional payment at the same unit prices as those applying to the base order. The notice states that the authority reserved the right to notify the supplier about potential activation of optional deliveries within two weeks of contract conclusion. After that period, the option may be exercised only with the supplier’s agreement. The supplied goods must be new, first-category products manufactured in the year of delivery. They must meet the quality requirements established in the procurement documents and applicable standards, including any required approvals and certificates. The supplier must also provide the documentation specified in the technical description. The authority’s authorised representatives are responsible for receiving and checking the goods for technical condition, quality and completeness at the delivery location. The detailed item schedule and technical specifications are contained in the procurement documents referenced by the notice. The published award notice does not reproduce the full technical specification. About the Contracting Authority Jednostka Wojskowa 4724 is identified as the contracting authority and the organisation responsible for signing the contract. The notice classifies it as a body governed by public law and lists defence as its main activity. The procurement department is identified as Sekcja Zamówień Publicznych. The organisation’s listed address is ul. Tyniecka 45, Kraków, postcode 30-901, Poland. The notice provides the following contact details: - Email: jw4724.szp.przetargi@ron.mil.pl - Telephone: 261132541 - Procurement information: [Jednostka Wojskowa 4724 procurement page](https://nil.wp.mil.pl/bip/a-ogoszenia/zamowienia-publiczne/) - Buyer profile: [Public procurement profile](https://nil.wp.mil.pl/pl/bip/zamowienia/) The authority provided additional procurement information and offline access to procurement documents, and it is also identified as the organisation that signed the contract. About the Organisations Involved Polish Innovation Labs sp. z o.o. is the successful tenderer named in the award notice. Its registered address is Prezydenta RP Ignacego Mościckiego 30, Skarżysko-Kamienna, postcode 26-110, Poland. The notice lists registration number 6631884483. The supplier’s tender, identified as PIL, was ranked first and valued at PLN 2,944,620. The notice states that the tender was not a variant and that subcontracting was not indicated. The second key organisation is Jednostka Wojskowa 4724, which acted as buyer and contracting authority. Krajowa Izba Odwoławcza is listed as the review and mediation organisation. The notice identifies its address as ul. Postępu 17a, Warsaw, postcode 02-676, Poland. Contact information includes odwolania@uzp.gov.pl and telephone +48 22 458 78 40. Further information is available through the [official Krajowa Izba Odwoławcza website](https://www.uzp.gov.pl/kio/). Procurement Analysis The notice records three tenders for the lot. All three were submitted electronically, and the statistical section classifies all three as tenders from micro, small or medium-sized tenderers. No tenders were recorded from bidders registered in other European Economic Area countries or from countries outside the EEA. The award criterion was price, weighted at 100%. The notice describes the criterion as selection of the most advantageous price. It does not publish the competing prices or a detailed comparative scoring table. The notice also records one tender as verified and inadmissible. It does not provide enough detail in the award summary to establish all reasons for that classification. The procurement did not use a framework agreement or a dynamic purchasing system. It was also not identified as being financed by European Union funds. A significant procedural point is the recorded appeal by Polish Innovation Labs. The review description states that the company challenged the authority’s decision to reject its offer and the earlier selection of WORKS 11 sp. z o.o. as the most advantageous bidder. The review decision dated 13 August 2026 is marked as accepted. The current award notice names Polish Innovation Labs as the winner and records the contract as concluded on 21 October 2026. The notice does not set out the full legal reasoning or explain the detailed changes to the evaluation following the review. Those details should not be inferred from the result notice alone. Additional Procurement Facts Several further details help define the contract’s procurement context. The procedure identifier is 3fef1a4e-23a8-4668-88c8-e1a063001a86, while the internal procurement reference is ZP/OiB/12/2026. The award covers a single lot, LOT-0001, and the procurement was conducted under the defence and security regime. The place of performance is listed as anywhere in the European Economic Area, while the notice identifies the delivery location as Jednostka Wojskowa 4724 – Skład Kłaj, in Kłaj, postcode 32-015, Poland. The contract value recorded for the winning tender is PLN 2,944,620. The notice also gives the total value of all contracts awarded in the notice as the same amount. The procurement documents referenced by the authority include a description of the subject matter, a detailed price offer, draft contract provisions and a technical-parameters schedule. The authority required bidders to identify the offered product clearly and to complete all required pricing positions. Incomplete offers or missing required product information could be rejected under the terms described in the notice. Market and Industry Perspective The award demonstrates demand for specified ammunition supplies within Poland’s defence procurement system. For companies operating in the defence supply chain, the procurement illustrates the importance of meeting tightly defined product requirements and providing the documentation needed to demonstrate compliance. The technical requirements described in the notice extend beyond the calibre and projectile type. They also address product condition, manufacturing year, quality assurance, applicable standards, approvals, certificates and acceptance checks at delivery. These requirements can influence the preparation of a bid and the supplier’s delivery arrangements. A bidder must be able to identify the exact goods offered, demonstrate that the products meet the required specifications and provide the documents requested by the authority. The notice does not identify the manufacturer of the ammunition or provide information on production capacity, component sourcing or wider market supply. It therefore cannot establish the supplier’s manufacturing arrangements or the award’s broader effect on Poland’s ammunition market. Economic Significance The contract has a stated value of PLN 2,944,620 and allows for a base quantity of 400,000 rounds, with up to 200,000 additional rounds available through the option mechanism. The optional provision gives the authority flexibility to increase the quantity purchased without establishing a separate procurement for those additional rounds, subject to the contract’s terms. Any additional payment under the option is to be calculated using the unit prices set out in the contract. The published notice does not disclose a separate price per round, a breakdown of costs or the amount attributable to the optional quantity. It is therefore not possible to calculate the precise cost of the base order or the optional portion from the award notice alone. The contract’s three-month duration and recorded end date of 20 November 2026 indicate a defined delivery period. The notice does not disclose the detailed delivery schedule, payment milestones or penalties for delayed delivery. Future Procurement Opportunities The award notice does not announce a follow-on tender or confirm a future procurement schedule. Nevertheless, the use of an optional quantity shows how a contracting authority can retain flexibility within a defined supply contract. Suppliers interested in similar opportunities should monitor official Polish procurement notices and the TED database for new defence and security supply requirements. Relevant opportunities may specify different quantities, technical parameters, delivery periods or eligibility conditions. Companies should review each notice independently rather than assume that the specifications in this contract will apply to future tenders. Defence procurement procedures may impose requirements on participation, documentation and technical compliance that differ from those in ordinary public supply contracts. Businesses can use [Polandtenders’s tender listings](https://www.Polandtenders.com/tenders.php) and [contract award notices](https://www.Polandtenders.com/contract-awards/) to monitor published procurement opportunities and award results. Opportunities for Suppliers For suppliers of ammunition and related defence products, this contract provides a concrete example of the information required in a public award notice and the compliance expectations described in the procurement documents. Businesses preparing for comparable tenders should pay particular attention to the following areas: - Technical identification: Clearly identify the exact product offered and complete the required technical-parameters schedule. - Full pricing: Price every required item and ensure the tender covers the complete contract scope where partial offers are not permitted. - Quality documentation: Confirm that the goods meet applicable standards and that required approvals, certificates and delivery documents are available. - Manufacturing and delivery readiness: Check requirements concerning product condition and the year of manufacture, as well as the delivery location and deadline. - Optional quantities: Assess whether the business can supply additional quantities under the stated unit prices and within the authority’s notification arrangements. - Procedure compliance: Review the applicable procurement rules, eligibility conditions and submission instructions before filing an offer. The appeal recorded in this procurement also shows that formal review procedures can be relevant when a bidder disputes a rejection or an award decision. Suppliers should rely on the applicable rules and published deadlines when considering a challenge. What Businesses Should Watch Companies monitoring Polish defence procurement should watch for new notices that specify ammunition calibre, projectile characteristics, quality requirements, quantities and delivery arrangements. The present award also highlights several details that deserve close attention in future procurement documents: - Whether the authority requests a base quantity with an option for additional supplies. - Whether the evaluation is based entirely on price or includes technical and quality criteria. - Which technical schedules, certificates and product documents must accompany the tender. - Whether partial offers are permitted or the complete scope must be priced. - How the authority defines acceptance checks and delivery obligations. - Whether the procurement is conducted under a restricted defence and security procedure. - Whether review proceedings affect the selection of the successful bidder. The published notice does not provide the full technical specification, a detailed evaluation report or the complete reasoning behind the review decision. Businesses requiring those details should consult the official procurement documents and any related published decisions. Polandtenders Procurement Intelligence This award highlights three practical indicators for suppliers tracking defence procurement. First, the technical specification is central to the tender. The authority required bidders to identify the goods clearly, submit technical parameters and supply products meeting the specified standards. In a procurement where incomplete pricing or missing product information can lead to rejection, document preparation is a material part of bid readiness. Second, the optional quantity affects supply planning. The authority may purchase up to 200,000 additional rounds beyond the 400,000-round base requirement, subject to the stated option conditions. Suppliers assessing similar contracts should consider both the committed quantity and the potential additional demand when planning production and delivery. Third, the award history demonstrates why tender outcomes should be monitored beyond the initial selection. The notice records a review brought by Polish Innovation Labs over its rejection and the earlier selection of WORKS 11 sp. z o.o. The current result names Polish Innovation Labs as the winning supplier. The available notice does not provide the full reasoning behind the decision, but it shows that procurement status and award results can change through formal review procedures. For procurement teams, monitoring both tender notices and contract award results can help build a clearer picture of supplier selection, buyer requirements and the procedural context of public contracts. Polandtenders provides access to [tender opportunities](https://www.Polandtenders.com/tenders.php) and [contract awards](https://www.Polandtenders.com/contract-awards/). Businesses can [register](https://www.Polandtenders.com/register.php) or [log in](https://www.Polandtenders.com/login.php) to explore the platform, and can use the [contact page](https://www.Polandtenders.com/contact.php) for assistance. Supplier Takeaways - Jednostka Wojskowa 4724 awarded the contract to Polish Innovation Labs sp. z o.o. for PLN 2,944,620. - The contract covers 5.56 × 45 mm ammunition with anti-ricochet projectiles. - The base order is 400,000 rounds, with an option for up to 200,000 additional rounds. - The award used a restricted procedure under the defence and security procurement framework. - Price was the sole stated award criterion, weighted at 100%. - Three tenders were recorded as received, with one tender listed as verified and inadmissible. - The notice records a review involving the rejection of Polish Innovation Labs’ bid and the earlier selection of WORKS 11 sp. z o.o. - The contract was concluded on 21 October 2026, with a recorded three-month duration ending on 20 November 2026. - Suppliers should check product specifications, technical schedules, quality documentation, full pricing requirements and delivery conditions before submitting comparable bids. Key Takeaways - Contract value: PLN 2,944,620. - Buyer: Jednostka Wojskowa 4724, Poland. - Successful supplier: Polish Innovation Labs sp. z o.o. - Supply requirement: Up to 600,000 rounds of 5.56 × 45 mm ammunition with anti-ricochet projectiles. - Procurement method: Restricted procedure. - Evaluation: Price weighted at 100%. - Contract date: 21 October 2026. - Publication: TED notice 743495-2026, published on 27 October 2026. - Procedural context: The notice records an accepted review decision dated 13 August 2026 concerning the rejection of the successful bidder’s offer and the earlier selection of another supplier. Conclusion Poland’s award of the PLN 2,944,620 ammunition supply contract to Polish Innovation Labs sp. z o.o. sets out a defined procurement requirement involving a base order of 400,000 rounds and an option for up to 200,000 additional rounds. The notice provides a clear picture of the contract’s value, scope, winning supplier, award criteria and delivery period. It also records a procurement review that forms part of the award’s procedural background. The notice does not disclose the complete technical specification, detailed price breakdown or full reasoning behind the review decision, so those points cannot be conclusively assessed from the published result alone. For defence suppliers, the procurement reinforces the importance of precise technical compliance, complete pricing, quality documentation and close monitoring of award outcomes and review procedures. Source Official TED contract award notice: 743495-2026 – Poland: Ammunition – Dostawa amunicji, published in OJ S 208/2026 on 27 October 2026. Contracting authority procurement information: Jednostka Wojskowa 4724 procurement page. Review organisation: Krajowa Izba Odwoławcza.
View Details