3 Regionalna Baza Logistyczna Awards Military Airfield Contracts

Standfirst

Poland has awarded contracts for the supply of mineral fertilisers used to maintain turf surfaces at military airfields. The procurement, conducted by 3 Regionalna Baza Logistyczna in Kraków, was divided into 11 lots covering different fertiliser products. Blending Sp. z o.o. won five lots while ADAR Handl Nawozami Sztucznymi Sp. z o.o. won three lots, while Lots 9 to 11 closed without a winner. The TED notice reports PLN 207.86 million as the value of all contracts awarded in the notice, although the individual winning tender values disclosed for Lots 1 to 8 are substantially lower.

Introduction

Poland has completed a major multi lot procurement for mineral fertilisers intended to maintain turf surfaces at military airfields. The contract award notice, TED publication 648740 2026, was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 21 September 2026.

The procurement was organised by 3 Regionalna Baza Logistyczna, a Polish public law body operating in the defence sector. The requirement covered 11 separate tasks, allowing suppliers to submit offers for any number of lots rather than requiring participation across the entire procurement.

The products covered a range of fertiliser categories, including granular superphosphate, enriched superphosphate, potassium salt, ammonium nitrate, Polifoska 5, magnesium sulphate, granular fertiliser urea and other products. All lots used CPV 24440000, Miscellaneous fertilisers.

Eight lots resulted in awarded contracts. Blending Sp. z o.o. won Lots 1, 2, 6, 7 and 8, while ADAR Handl Nawozami Sztucznymi Sp. z o.o. won Lots 3, 4 and 5. Lots 9, 10 and 11 received tenders but were closed without a winner because all submitted tenders were withdrawn or found inadmissible.

Why This Contract Matters

The procurement illustrates how defence organisations can require specialised agricultural and grounds maintenance supplies as part of broader military infrastructure management. Military airfields depend on maintained turf areas for operational and safety related requirements, making the availability of suitable fertiliser products a recurring procurement consideration.

Rather than combining all products into a single contract, the Polish buyer separated the requirement into 11 lots based on individual fertiliser types. This structure allows suppliers with capabilities in particular product categories to participate without necessarily having to supply the entire range.

The result also provides useful market intelligence because several lots attracted multiple electronic tenders. Lots 1, 2 and 6 received two tenders each, while Lots 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8 received three tenders each.

The three unsuccessful lots are equally important from a procurement intelligence perspective. Lots 9, 10 and 11 each received three tenders but no contract was awarded because the submitted tenders were withdrawn or considered inadmissible.

Contract Timeline

The procurement followed an open procedure under the Polish Public Procurement Law. The previous procurement notice was numbered 294902 2026 and the internal identifier for the procedure was 81/2026/D.

For Lots 3, 4 and 5, the successful suppliers were selected on 25 June 2026 and the contracts were concluded on 15 July 2026. For Lots 6, 7 and 8, the winners were also selected on 25 June 2026, with contracts concluded on 8 July 2026.

For Lots 1 and 2, the winner was selected on 17 July 2026 and contracts were concluded on 28 July 2026. The delivery period for the awarded lots is 16 weeks from contract conclusion, subject to the notice conditions and a final deadline of 30 October 2026.

Contract Overview

The procurement covers the supply of mineral fertilisers for the maintenance of turf surfaces at military airfields in Poland. The buyer did not provide an option right and required suppliers to submit documentary evidence confirming that their proposed products met the specified requirements.

The procedure was conducted as an open tender. Price was the sole award criterion, carrying 100 points for the lots covered by the notice.

The procurement was not financed with European Union funds. It was covered by the Government Procurement Agreement and did not use a framework agreement or a dynamic purchasing system.

Key Contract Details

Project Scope

The procurement covers mineral fertilisers required to maintain turf surfaces at military airfields. The buyer divided the requirement into 11 product specific tasks and allowed suppliers to submit offers for any number of tasks.

Lot 1 covered granular superphosphate 19 percent. Lot 2 covered enriched superphosphate 40 percent. Lot 3 concerned potassium salt 40 percent while Lot 4 covered potassium salt 60 percent.

Lot 5 concerned ammonium nitrate 34 percent. Lot 6 covered Polifoska 5 and Lot 7 covered magnesium sulphate. Lot 8 covered granular fertiliser urea 46 percent. Lots 9 to 11 covered different types of agricultural lime products.

The procurement documents specified product requirements and required suppliers to provide evidence demonstrating compliance. The notice states that deliveries could not begin before 1 September 2026 for the relevant tasks and were required to be completed within 16 weeks of contract conclusion, subject to the stated final deadline.

About the Contracting Authority

3 Regionalna Baza Logistyczna is the contracting authority responsible for this defence procurement. The organisation operates from ul. Montelupich 3 in Kraków and is identified in the notice as a public law body whose contracting activity relates to defence.

The organisation also performs several procurement functions in this procedure, including providing procurement information, signing contracts, financing the contracts and executing payments.

About the Organisations Involved

3 Regionalna Baza Logistyczna is the buyer and contracting organisation. Its public procurement section managed the procedure and its budget is identified as the source used to pay for the contracts.

Blending Sp. z o.o. is one of the two successful suppliers. The company is classified as a medium sized economic operator and is based in Zduny, Poland. It won Lots 1, 2, 6, 7 and 8.

ADAR Handl Nawozami Sztucznymi Sp. z o.o. is the second successful supplier. The company is classified as a medium sized economic operator and is based in Pakość, Poland. It won Lots 3, 4 and 5.

Prezes Krajowej Izby Odwoławczej, representing the Krajowa Izba Odwoławcza, is identified as the review organisation for the procurement. The review body is based in Warsaw.

Publications Office of the European Union is identified as the TED publication organisation associated with the notice.

Procurement Analysis

The open procedure created an opportunity for suppliers to compete across multiple product categories. Because suppliers could bid for any number of lots, the structure allowed companies to target product categories aligned with their commercial capabilities.

Price was the sole award criterion, with a weighting of 100 points. This creates a procurement environment in which compliant suppliers compete primarily through price once the required technical and documentary conditions have been satisfied.

Competition varied by lot. Lots 1, 2 and 6 attracted two tenders each while Lots 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8 attracted three tenders each. The notice also records that the received tenders were submitted electronically and that the participating tenders came from micro, small or medium sized tenderers.

The results show that two medium sized suppliers captured all eight awarded lots. This concentration occurred despite the procurement being divided into multiple product categories and allowing participation in any number of tasks.

Additional Procurement Facts

The procurement is governed by Directive 2014/24/EU and the Polish Public Procurement Law. The buyer did not require a bid bond or performance security before contract signature.

The procurement documents required suppliers to provide subject matter evidence demonstrating compliance with the buyer's technical requirements. The contracting authority also retained the possibility of supplementing missing or incomplete evidence under the applicable Polish procurement rules.

The notice records no EU funding. It also states that there is no framework agreement and no dynamic purchasing system. The Government Procurement Agreement applies to the procurement.

The buyer also included eligibility and exclusion requirements linked to Polish procurement law and restrictions concerning entities covered by specified sanctions and security related provisions.

Market & Industry Perspective

The award provides a useful view of a specialised segment of defence procurement in which the products themselves are conventional agricultural inputs but the end use is linked to military infrastructure. This creates a procurement market where product compliance, documentation and delivery capability can be as important as general fertiliser market participation.

The lot based structure also demonstrates how public buyers can divide a broad procurement requirement into commercially distinct product categories. Such structures can create opportunities for suppliers that specialise in individual fertiliser products rather than maintaining a complete product portfolio.

The participation of medium sized suppliers across the awarded lots indicates that defence procurement can include opportunities for companies that are not among the largest industrial groups. However, suppliers still need to meet the buyer's documentary and technical requirements.

Economic Significance

The notice reports PLN 207,859,500 as the value of all contracts awarded in the notice. At the same time, the individual winning tender values disclosed for Lots 1 to 8 are much smaller and together amount to approximately PLN 1.69 million.

This difference is important for procurement data users. The published notice level value should be reported as stated, but individual tender values should not be artificially adjusted to make them match the aggregate figure. The discrepancy should therefore be treated as a data point requiring caution when using the notice for price benchmarking.

Future Procurement Opportunities

The procurement suggests continuing demand for maintenance supplies associated with military airfield infrastructure. Future opportunities may include repeat purchases of the same fertiliser categories or new requirements resulting from operational maintenance schedules.

The three lots that closed without a winner may also be relevant for future procurement monitoring. Lots 9, 10 and 11 received three tenders each but no winner was selected because all tenders were withdrawn or found inadmissible.

Future procurement activity may therefore provide opportunities for suppliers able to address the reasons for non award and submit fully compliant offers. Businesses should monitor subsequent notices from the same contracting authority for revised requirements or new procedures.

Opportunities for Suppliers

Fertiliser manufacturers, distributors and specialist agricultural suppliers can monitor Polish defence procurement for similar requirements. The current procurement demonstrates that suppliers do not necessarily need to cover the entire product range because bids could be submitted for any number of lots.

Companies should also focus on documentation and compliance. The contracting authority specifically required evidence confirming that proposed products met its requirements. A commercially competitive price therefore needed to be accompanied by an offer satisfying the procurement conditions.

Medium sized suppliers may find this type of procurement particularly relevant because the awarded contracts demonstrate participation by companies classified as medium sized economic operators.

What Businesses Should Watch

Suppliers should monitor the procurement activity of 3 Regionalna Baza Logistyczna and other Polish defence purchasing bodies for future supply requirements. CPV 24440000 can be used as one useful classification for identifying fertiliser procurement notices.

Businesses should also monitor unsuccessful lots separately from awarded lots. A lot that receives several tenders but ends without an award can indicate a future procurement opportunity if the authority subsequently restarts the requirement.

Price should remain an important consideration for suppliers targeting comparable procurements because the current notice used price as the sole award criterion. However, suppliers should first establish that their products and supporting documentation satisfy the technical requirements.

Finally, companies using contract award data for market intelligence should distinguish between aggregate notice values and individual lot tender values. The current notice demonstrates why both levels of procurement data need to be reviewed before drawing pricing conclusions.

PolandTenders.com Procurement Intelligence

From a procurement intelligence perspective, this award illustrates a broader trend toward increasingly granular public procurement. Instead of buying a broad category of fertiliser through one contract, the Polish defence buyer divided the requirement into 11 product specific lots. This creates a more detailed view of supplier capability, competition and pricing across individual product categories.

The strategic significance of the procurement is also connected to the relationship between ordinary commercial products and specialised government end users. Fertilisers are widely traded products, but supplying a defence organisation introduces additional requirements relating to technical documentation, eligibility, delivery and procurement compliance.

For suppliers, one of the most important lessons is the value of lot level tender monitoring. A business that monitors only the overall procurement title may overlook the fact that its specific product category is being procured separately. CPV based monitoring combined with product keyword intelligence can therefore provide a more precise picture of opportunities.

The results also demonstrate the importance of analysing unsuccessful tenders. Lots 9, 10 and 11 attracted three tenders each but did not result in awards. For procurement intelligence purposes, these lots should not simply be treated as closed opportunities. They can remain relevant indicators of unresolved buyer demand, particularly if the authority later publishes a new procurement.

Future contracts in this market could continue to use multiple lots to separate fertiliser types and encourage specialist participation. Suppliers that maintain strong product documentation, understand Polish public procurement requirements and track buyer specific procurement patterns can use award history to identify recurring demand and prepare earlier for subsequent competitions.

Supplier Takeaways

• 3 Regionalna Baza Logistyczna procured mineral fertilisers for maintaining turf surfaces at Polish military airfields.
• The procurement was divided into 11 lots.
• Suppliers could submit offers for any number of lots.
• Blending Sp. z o.o. won Lots 1, 2, 6, 7 and 8.
• ADAR Handl Nawozami Sztucznymi Sp. z o.o. won Lots 3, 4 and 5.
• Lots 9, 10 and 11 closed without a winner.
• Price was the sole award criterion with a weighting of 100 points.
• Lots 1, 2 and 6 received two tenders each.
• Lots 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8 received three tenders each.
• The awarded suppliers were classified as medium sized economic operators.
• No EU funds were used.
• The procurement was covered by the GPA.
• No framework agreement or dynamic purchasing system was used.
• Product compliance documentation was an important part of the procurement requirements.

Key Takeaways

• Country: Poland
• Buyer: 3 Regionalna Baza Logistyczna
• Sector: Defence and military infrastructure maintenance
• Requirement: Mineral fertilisers for military airfield turf surfaces
• CPV: 24440000, Miscellaneous fertilisers
• Procedure: Open procedure
• Total lots: 11
• Lots awarded: 8
• Lots without winner: 3
• Blending winning lots: 1, 2, 6, 7 and 8
• ADAR winning lots: 3, 4 and 5
• Notice reported award value: PLN 207,859,500
• Award criterion: Price, 100 points
• EU funding: No
• GPA: Yes
• Framework agreement: No
• DPS: No
• Review body: Prezes Krajowej Izby Odwoławczej

Conclusion

Poland's award of mineral fertiliser supply contracts for military airfields demonstrates how defence procurement can generate opportunities for specialised suppliers of conventional commercial products. The eight awarded lots were divided between Blending Sp. z o.o. and ADAR Handl Nawozami Sztucznymi Sp. z o.o., while three additional lots closed without a winner.

For suppliers, the procurement highlights the importance of lot level opportunity tracking, technical compliance, competitive pricing and monitoring of unsuccessful procurement lots for potential future opportunities.

Source: TED Contract or Concession Award Notice 648740 2026, Poland, OJ S 182/2026, published 21 September 2026.