Poland’s Military Unit 2305 Closes Volkswagen Vehicle Repair Tender

Standfirst

Poland's State Treasury Military Unit No. 2305 has closed a procurement for maintenance and repair services for Volkswagen vehicles in Gdańsk without selecting a winner. The award notice cites the absence of suitable tenders in a previous procurement as the justification for using a negotiated procedure without a prior call for competition. However, the result recorded for the lot shows zero tenders received and no successful supplier. Published on 28 October 2026, the notice provides no awarded contract value or confirmed repair provider.

Introduction

A Polish defence procurement for maintenance and repair services for Volkswagen vehicles in Gdańsk has been closed without a winner, according to a contract result notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 28 October 2026.

The contracting authority is Skarb Państwa - Jednostka Wojskowa Nr 2305, or the State Treasury's Military Unit No. 2305. The authority's main activity is defence, and the procurement concerns servicing and repair work for Volkswagen vehicles in Gdańsk, Poland.

The notice, numbered 746721-2026, records no winner for lot LOT-0003 and states that the competition is closed. Its result section reports zero tenders received. It also identifies the absence of suitable tenders, requests to participate or applications in response to a previous notice as the justification for the procurement approach.

The procedure is recorded as a negotiated procedure without a prior call for competition. The notice cites Article 214(1)(6) of Poland's Public Procurement Law of 11 September 2019 as the national legal basis for the stated justification, referring to circumstances in which an earlier open or restricted procedure did not produce eligible applications or acceptable tenders and the original contract conditions were not substantially changed.

The published record does not identify a successful supplier, report an awarded value or provide a new contract conclusion date. It is therefore a notice of an unsuccessful procurement result, not a completed award to a vehicle maintenance company.

Why This Contract Matters

Vehicle maintenance is an operational requirement for organisations that rely on transport assets. For a defence authority, maintenance and repair services can be part of the support needed to keep vehicles available for their intended duties. This procurement concerned Volkswagen vehicles in Gdańsk, although the notice does not specify the number of vehicles, their models, their operational roles or the particular repairs required.

The result is notable because the procurement closed without selecting a supplier. The notice records zero tenders for the lot, while its direct-award justification refers to the lack of suitable submissions in an earlier procurement. This highlights the distinction between the justification for using a particular procedure and the result of the procurement reported in the notice.

For suppliers, the case demonstrates the importance of identifying why a contracting authority has moved to a negotiated procedure without a prior competition notice. The published information does not disclose the details of the earlier procedure, the specific deficiencies in any previous submissions or the reasons that no tenders were recorded for the present lot.

The notice also does not establish whether the authority will launch a replacement procurement, amend its requirements or use another route to secure maintenance services. Those outcomes remain unconfirmed.

Contract Timeline

The notice provides the publication and procedure information below, but does not give a date for a contract award or signing because no winner was selected.

• Previous procurement: The notice cites the absence of suitable tenders, requests to participate or applications in response to a previous notice as the justification for the procedure. The date and reference number of that earlier procurement are not specified in the result notice.
• Procurement identifier: The procedure is recorded under internal identifier ZP-28/2026.
• Lot identifier: The lot is identified as LOT-0003, with the lot-level internal identifier ZP-11/2026.
• 27 October 2026: The result notice was dispatched for publication.
• 28 October 2026: Notice 746721-2026 was published in OJ S 209/2026.

The notice lists a 12-month duration for the lot, but because no winner was selected and no contract award is reported, this should not be read as confirmation that a 12-month service contract began.

Contract Overview

The procurement title in Polish is “Wykonywanie usług obsługowo - naprawczych pojazdów marki VOLKSWAGEN w m. Gdańsk”. It refers to the performance of servicing and repair services for Volkswagen vehicles in Gdańsk.

The contract is classified as a services procurement, with the main Common Procurement Vocabulary (CPV) code 50630000, covering repair and maintenance services of military vehicles. The place of performance is Gdańsk in the Gdański NUTS region of Poland.

The buyer is Skarb Państwa - Jednostka Wojskowa Nr 2305, a public-law body whose stated main activity is defence. The notice lists the procurement under the standard public procurement regime and identifies Directive 2014/24/EU as the legal basis at the European level.

The procedure field identifies a negotiated procedure without a prior call for competition. The results section separately labels the outcome as a direct award and cites the lack of suitable tenders or applications in the previous procedure as the justification. Nevertheless, the result for LOT-0003 explicitly states that no winner was chosen and the competition was closed.

No contract value, winning bid, successful supplier or contract conclusion date is provided for this lot. The notice therefore confirms the procurement's subject and unsuccessful result but does not establish the financial value of any completed award.

Key Contract Details

Project Scope

The published description is brief and identifies the required service as maintenance and repair work for Volkswagen vehicles in Gdańsk. The CPV classification places the procurement within repair and maintenance services for military vehicles.

The result notice does not include a detailed technical specification. It does not state the number of vehicles to be serviced, the vehicle models or ages, the expected volume of repairs, the maintenance schedule or whether services were to be performed at a military facility or a contractor's workshop.

It also does not provide specific service-level requirements, response times, parts requirements, warranty conditions or a breakdown between routine maintenance and corrective repairs. Those details, if defined, would need to be checked in the original procurement documents.

The lot record lists a duration of 12 months. However, because the result states that no winner was chosen and the competition was closed, the published duration should be understood as a procurement field rather than evidence of an active service agreement.

About the Contracting Authority

Skarb Państwa - Jednostka Wojskowa Nr 2305 is the contracting authority named in the notice. It is classified as a body governed by public law, with defence listed as its principal activity.

The authority's public procurement department is identified as “Grupa ds. Zamówień Publicznych”. Its listed address is ul. Marsa 80, 04-520 Warszawa, Poland. The procurement contact email is 2305.zamowienia@ron.mil.pl, and the telephone number provided is +48 261895027.

The notice lists the authority's website as www.grom.wp.mil.pl. It also provides a procurement information exchange endpoint at portal.smartpzp.pl/jw2305 and a buyer profile at platformazakupowa.pl.

The authority is listed as the organisation providing additional information about the procurement procedure. The notice does not name a maintenance company as a successful contractor, because no winner was selected for the lot.

About the Organisations Involved

Skarb Państwa - Jednostka Wojskowa Nr 2305: The buyer and defence authority responsible for the procurement. The notice identifies its public procurement department and provides its contact information in Warsaw. It is the organisation associated with the unsuccessful lot.

Krajowa Izba Odwoławcza: Poland's National Appeals Chamber is listed as both the review and mediation organisation. It is also identified as the organisation providing further information on review procedures. The notice explains that remedies available during the procurement process include an appeal to the chamber and a complaint to a regional court, subject to the terms and deadlines set out in Polish public procurement law.

Publications Office of the European Union: The Publications Office is identified in the notice as the TED eSender. Its role in the record concerns the publication system rather than delivery of the vehicle maintenance services.

No successful supplier is identified in the notice. The result section explicitly records that no winner was chosen, so there is no awarded contractor profile or successful tender value to report.

Procurement Analysis

The procurement record contains several details that are important for interpreting the outcome accurately. The procedure type is shown as a negotiated procedure without a prior call for competition. The results section also identifies the procurement as a direct award and gives the absence of suitable submissions in an earlier procedure as its justification.

The national legal justification cites Article 214(1)(6) of Poland's Public Procurement Law of 11 September 2019. The text supplied in the notice describes circumstances in which an authority may use a negotiated procedure without publication if an earlier open or restricted procedure received no participation applications, or if applications or tenders were rejected on the specified statutory grounds, provided the original contract conditions were not substantially changed.

This explanation relates to the legal justification for the procurement approach. It does not mean that a supplier was ultimately selected in the result being reported. For LOT-0003, the notice states that no winner was chosen and the competition was closed.

The lot's stated award criterion was price at 100%. This means price was identified as the sole award criterion in the published lot record. However, the notice reports zero tenders received for the lot, so it does not provide a price comparison, winning price or evidence of a price-based selection among bids.

The notice includes two internal identifiers: ZP-28/2026 for the procedure and ZP-11/2026 for the lot. These are reproduced as recorded and should not be treated as identical identifiers.

The record also lists a 12-month duration without reporting an award or contract conclusion date. The duration therefore cannot be used to infer that a service contract was signed or commenced.

Additional Procurement Facts

• European legal basis: Directive 2014/24/EU.
• National legal reference: Article 214(1)(6) of Poland's Public Procurement Law of 11 September 2019, as cited in the notice.
• Procedure: Negotiated procedure without a prior call for competition.
• Direct-award justification: No suitable tenders, requests to participate or applications were received in response to a previous notice, according to the published justification field.
• Lot result: No winner selected; the competition is closed.
• Submission statistics: The lot result lists zero tenders, including zero electronic tenders and zero tenders in the other submission categories shown.
• Contract value: No awarded value is stated.
• Contract duration field: 12 months.
• Framework agreement: No framework agreement is recorded.
• Dynamic purchasing system: No dynamic purchasing system is recorded.
• EU funding: The procurement is not financed with EU funds.
• Government Procurement Agreement: The notice states that the procurement is not covered by the GPA.
• Strategic procurement: No strategic procurement objective is recorded.
• Green public procurement: No green public procurement criteria are recorded.
• Review organisation: Krajowa Izba Odwoławcza.

Market and Industry Perspective

The procurement falls within the market for vehicle servicing and repair, with a specific focus on military vehicle maintenance. Such services can involve workshop capacity, vehicle diagnostics, repair expertise and access to appropriate replacement parts. However, the published notice does not set out the detailed technical or commercial requirements for this particular procurement.

The absence of a selected winner means the result does not identify a supplier that secured the work or establish a contract price against which other maintenance providers can benchmark their offers. It also does not provide enough information to conclude whether the lack of a winner resulted from the technical scope, commercial conditions, supplier availability or another factor.

The stated use of a negotiated procedure without a prior call for competition is relevant to suppliers tracking public-sector opportunities. The justification field points to a previous procedure that did not produce suitable submissions. The notice does not include enough information to assess the earlier competition's participation levels or the reasons particular submissions may have been unsuitable.

For businesses monitoring defence-related vehicle maintenance opportunities, the main takeaway is procedural rather than commercial: the requirement was published as an unsuccessful result, and the notice does not confirm that the service has been awarded to any company.

Economic Significance

The notice does not disclose an estimated contract value, a winning bid amount or a final contract price for LOT-0003. As a result, the financial scale of the maintenance requirement cannot be reliably quantified from the published result alone.

The absence of a reported value also prevents a meaningful comparison between the procurement and other vehicle maintenance contracts. No supplier revenue, expenditure commitment or confirmed contract duration can be attributed to a successful award on the basis of this notice.

Although the lot information lists a 12-month duration, the result explicitly states that no winner was chosen and the competition was closed. It would therefore be inaccurate to treat the stated duration as evidence of a signed contract or to calculate a monthly contract value from it.

The potential economic implications for the authority depend on what happens next, such as whether another procurement is launched or another lawful route is pursued. The notice does not announce a follow-up procurement or confirm any replacement arrangement.

Future Procurement Opportunities

The result notice does not announce a new tender, a revised competition or a planned re-publication of the requirement. Suppliers should therefore not interpret it as an open invitation to submit offers.

Businesses that provide vehicle servicing, repair, diagnostics or fleet maintenance services may nevertheless monitor future notices from the authority and other public-sector buyers. Relevant opportunities may be published under CPV code 50630000 or related classifications, depending on the specific scope of each procurement.

For any future competition, suppliers should review the complete procurement documents to determine the vehicles covered, the technical requirements, service locations, delivery times, parts arrangements, eligibility conditions and evaluation methodology. Those details cannot be established from the present result notice.

Businesses can review current procurement notices through Polandtenders's tender listings and monitor completed procurement outcomes through the contract awards section.

Opportunities for Suppliers

Although this particular lot closed without a winner, the published record offers suppliers several practical points to consider when preparing for similar vehicle maintenance procurements.

• Review the scope carefully: Confirm which vehicles, locations and categories of maintenance are included in any future tender documentation.
• Check procedural notices: Where a notice refers to a previous unsuccessful procurement, review the available documents to understand the stated procedure and requirements.
• Prepare a compliant bid: Ensure the submission meets the formal requirements, eligibility conditions and technical specifications set by the authority.
• Assess pricing requirements: This lot listed price as the sole award criterion. Suppliers should check the actual pricing format and cost assumptions in any future procurement documents rather than infer them from this result.
• Monitor official procurement channels: Use the authority's listed procurement platform and other tender sources to check whether a new opportunity is published.
• Avoid assuming a contract is available: A result notice recording no winner is not an active tender notice.

Suppliers seeking wider visibility into published public procurement notices can register with Polandtenders or log in to an existing account. For platform-related enquiries, they can use the Polandtenders contact page.

What Businesses Should Watch

Businesses tracking this procurement should distinguish between the legal justification for the procedure and the recorded result. The notice refers to an earlier procurement that did not produce suitable submissions, but the current lot result also records zero tenders and no selected winner. The published information does not explain the full sequence of events in the earlier procedure.

Another point to monitor is whether the contracting authority publishes a replacement tender or a subsequent notice. No such follow-up is confirmed in the present record. Suppliers should rely on official publications rather than assume that the requirement will automatically return to the market.

The internal identifiers also merit attention. The overall procedure is listed as ZP-28/2026, while the lot is associated with ZP-11/2026. These identifiers should be retained as published when searching for related documents or contacting the authority.

Finally, the stated 12-month duration should not be interpreted as an active contract term. With no winner selected and no contract value reported, the notice does not establish that services have commenced or that a maintenance provider has been appointed.

Polandtenders Procurement Intelligence

This notice is an example of why procurement results must be interpreted separately from contract awards. Although it is published as a contract or concession award notice, the result for LOT-0003 records that no winner was selected and the competition was closed. The document provides no successful supplier or awarded value.

The procedure record states that the authority used a negotiated procedure without a prior call for competition and cites the lack of suitable tenders or applications in an earlier procurement as the justification. That procedural explanation is important, but it does not establish that a contract was ultimately concluded.

The 100% price criterion is another useful detail, although it should be read in context. Because the lot result records zero tenders received, the notice does not show a winning price or a competitive price comparison.

For suppliers and procurement analysts, the key intelligence is the status of the requirement: the published result does not confirm an award. Monitoring subsequent notices from the contracting authority is necessary to determine whether the maintenance requirement is retendered or otherwise addressed.

Readers can follow new opportunities through Polandtenders tender listings and use the contract awards database to distinguish successful awards from other procurement outcomes.

Supplier Takeaways

• Poland's Military Unit No. 2305 published a result notice for Volkswagen vehicle maintenance and repair services in Gdańsk.
• The notice was published on 28 October 2026 as TED notice 746721-2026.
• The procurement was recorded as a negotiated procedure without a prior call for competition.
• The stated justification refers to the absence of suitable submissions in a previous procurement.
• The result for LOT-0003 states that no winner was selected and the competition was closed.
• The lot result records zero tenders received.
• The published notice does not identify a successful supplier or provide an awarded contract value.
• The lot lists a 12-month duration, but this does not confirm that a contract was signed or commenced.
• Price was recorded as the sole award criterion at 100%, but no winning price is reported.
• Suppliers should monitor official channels for any future procurement notice rather than treat this result as an open tender.

Key Takeaways

• Procurement: Volkswagen vehicle maintenance and repair services in Gdańsk, Poland.
• Buyer: Skarb Państwa - Jednostka Wojskowa Nr 2305.
• Notice: 746721-2026, published 28 October 2026.
• Procedure: Negotiated without a prior call for competition.
• Outcome: No winner selected; the competition was closed.
• Submissions: Zero tenders recorded for the lot.
• Financial value: No awarded value stated.
• Duration field: 12 months, without confirmation of a signed contract.
• Next step for suppliers: Monitor official notices for any replacement or future procurement.

Conclusion

Poland's Military Unit No. 2305 has published an unsuccessful procurement result for Volkswagen vehicle maintenance and repair services in Gdańsk. TED notice 746721-2026 records that no winner was selected for LOT-0003 and that the competition was closed, with zero tenders received in the lot result.

The notice cites the lack of suitable submissions in a previous procurement as the justification for using a negotiated procedure without a prior call for competition. However, it does not identify a successful supplier, provide an awarded value or confirm that a service contract was concluded.

For vehicle maintenance businesses and procurement analysts, the notice provides information about the requirement and its procedural outcome, but not a live bidding opportunity. Any future opportunity will need to be confirmed through a subsequent official procurement publication.

Source

Official source: TED Contract Result Notice 746721-2026, “Wykonywanie usług obsługowo - naprawczych pojazdów marki VOLKSWAGEN w m. Gdańsk”, published in OJ S 209/2026 on 28 October 2026.

Contracting authority: Skarb Państwa - Jednostka Wojskowa Nr 2305. Procurement email: 2305.zamowienia@ron.mil.pl. Buyer profile: platformazakupowa.pl. Procurement information exchange endpoint: portal.smartpzp.pl/jw2305.