Poland Awards PLN 386.3 Million Rail Maintenance Contract for 35WEa Electric Multiple Units
22 Sep 2026
Standfirst Szybka Kolej Miejska Sp. z o.o. in Warsaw has awarded a PLN 386.3 million contract for fifth level maintenance of nine 35WEa electric multiple units to Public Transport Service sp. z o.o. The procurement also includes an option covering four 19WEa electric multiple units, additional maintenance works and expanded staff training. The contract focuses on major rolling stock maintenance, repair capability and workforce training. One tender was received and the contract was concluded on 18 September 2026. Introduction Szybka Kolej Miejska Sp. z o.o., the Warsaw urban railway operator, has completed a major procurement for fifth level maintenance of its 35WEa electric multiple units. The contract covers nine vehicles under the basic scope and includes an extensive option structure that could expand the work to four 19WEa vehicles and additional maintenance activities. Public Transport Service sp. z o.o. was selected as the successful tenderer with a contract value of PLN 386,301,960.20. The procurement was conducted through an open procedure under the EU utilities procurement framework. The award is relevant to Poland's rail maintenance market because P5 maintenance represents a substantial technical intervention in the lifecycle of electric rolling stock. Alongside vehicle maintenance, the contract incorporates knowledge transfer through training for the contracting authority's personnel. This combination creates a procurement model in which technical capability, turnaround time and warranty conditions all form part of the commercial evaluation. Why This Contract Matters The PLN 386.3 million award represents a substantial rolling stock maintenance requirement for Warsaw's urban railway system. Rather than focusing only on routine servicing, the procurement covers fifth level maintenance of nine 35WEa electric multiple units and provides an option for further work on 19WEa vehicles. The procurement also connects maintenance activity with operational knowledge. The basic scope requires training for up to 65 employees of Szybka Kolej Miejska at the contractor's work location. If the option is exercised for 19WEa vehicles, the training can be expanded to cover that vehicle type as well. For the rail services industry, the award demonstrates demand for suppliers capable of combining heavy maintenance, technical documentation, specialist workforce capability and post maintenance support. Contract Timeline The procurement was conducted through an open procedure and followed an earlier notice numbered 491377-2026. The internal procurement identifier is OPZ-210-1/2026. The contract with Public Transport Service sp. z o.o. was concluded on 18 September 2026. The result notice was dispatched on 21 September 2026 and published in OJ S 183/2026 on 22 September 2026. Contract Overview The procurement covers P5 maintenance of nine 35WEa electric multiple units according to the applicable maintenance system documentation. The contract also includes training for a maximum of 65 employees of the contracting authority. Through the option, the scope may be expanded to four 19WEa vehicles, additional planned and unplanned maintenance works and further training and authorisation activities. The contract has a duration of 930 days and does not provide for contract renewals. The procurement consists of one lot and uses CPV 50222000, covering repair and maintenance services of rolling stock. Key Contract Details CountryPoland Contracting AuthoritySzybka Kolej Miejska Sp. z o.o. ProcurementP5 maintenance of nine 35WEa electric multiple units with option rights WinnerPublic Transport Service sp. z o.o. Contract ValuePLN 386,301,960.20 Contract Date18 September 2026 Duration930 days RenewalsNone ProcedureOpen procedure Tenders Received1 Main CPV50222000, Repair and maintenance services of rolling stock Basic ScopeP5 maintenance of nine 35WEa vehicles OptionP5 maintenance of four 19WEa vehicles and additional works Framework AgreementNo Dynamic Purchasing SystemNo GPANo The TED notice reports PLN 386,301,960.20 as the value of all contracts awarded in the notice and the value of the winning tender. The procurement received one tender, which was submitted electronically and came from a micro, small or medium sized tenderer. Project Scope The basic procurement requirement is the performance of nine P5 maintenance services for 35WEa electric multiple units in accordance with the applicable maintenance system documentation. P5 represents a higher level of rolling stock maintenance requiring detailed technical inspection, servicing and repair activities. The procurement also requires the successful supplier to provide training at its work location for up to 65 employees of Szybka Kolej Miejska. This training is designed to cover work performed on 35WEa vehicles. If the contracting authority exercises the option, the procurement can be expanded to four 19WEa vehicles. The option can also include additional planned and unplanned works beyond the maintenance documentation, expanded training and the provision of authorisations where changes to the vehicle configuration require additional staff competence. About the Contracting Authority Szybka Kolej Miejska Sp. z o.o. is the contracting entity and operates in the urban railway, tramway, trolleybus or bus services sector. The authority is based in Warsaw and is responsible for the procurement and associated tender documentation. The procurement's place of performance is the Miasto Warszawa NUTS region in Poland, reflecting its connection with Warsaw's urban rail transport system. About the Organisations Involved Szybka Kolej Miejska Sp. z o.o. acted as the contracting authority, buyer and organisation responsible for providing procurement information and access to procurement documents. Its headquarters are listed in Warsaw. Public Transport Service sp. z o.o. was the successful tenderer and winner of the only lot. TED classifies the company as a micro, small or medium sized enterprise. The company is based in Nakło nad Notecią, Poland. Krajowa Izba Odwoławcza is identified as the review organisation and as the organisation providing information concerning review procedures. The body is based in Warsaw. Publications Office of the European Union is identified as the TED eSender responsible for transmitting the notice through the European procurement publication system. Procurement Analysis The evaluation model placed the largest emphasis on price, which accounted for 85% of the award criteria. Quality represented the remaining 15%, divided between the repair completion time for 35WEa vehicles at 10% and warranty at 5%. This structure shows that the contracting authority placed significant importance on the commercial cost of the maintenance programme while retaining specific quality safeguards. The inclusion of repair completion time as a quality criterion is particularly relevant for rolling stock because vehicle availability can directly affect fleet deployment. The warranty criterion also provides a mechanism for considering post repair reliability. For suppliers, this means that the commercial proposal must account for both immediate maintenance costs and the operational commitments associated with the completed work. The procurement received only one tender. The winning tender was submitted by Public Transport Service sp. z o.o. and no alternative tender was recorded. The notice states that subcontracting was not yet known at the time of publication. Additional Procurement Facts The procurement was conducted under Directive 2014/25/EU, which applies to procurement by entities operating in sectors including transport. The contracting authority also conducted preliminary market consultations before launching the procedure. According to the notice, those consultations were intended to obtain advice on preparing the description of the contract subject and determining contractual conditions. The notice states that information obtained during the consultations was used in a manner intended to preserve fair competition and equal treatment of tenderers. Additional exclusion provisions included measures linked to EU restrictive measures concerning Russia and certain provisions of Polish public procurement law. Market & Industry Perspective The contract highlights continued demand for specialist rolling stock maintenance capabilities in Poland. Urban rail operators require maintenance suppliers that can support vehicles throughout their operational lifecycle while meeting technical documentation and safety requirements. The inclusion of both 35WEa and potential 19WEa maintenance illustrates the importance of multi fleet technical competence. Suppliers competing for similar contracts may need to demonstrate expertise across different electric multiple unit configurations and the ability to adapt maintenance activities to specific vehicle documentation. The training requirement is another important market signal. The contracting authority is not simply purchasing maintenance work but is also seeking knowledge transfer to its own employees. This creates opportunities for maintenance providers that can combine workshop capability with structured technical training. Economic Significance At PLN 386.3 million, the contract represents a substantial expenditure on railway rolling stock maintenance. The value reflects the scale of the maintenance requirement, the number of vehicles covered and the additional option structure. For the Polish rail services market, contracts of this size can support specialist maintenance businesses, engineering personnel, technical facilities and associated supply chains. The participation of an SME as the winning tenderer also demonstrates that substantial rolling stock service contracts can be accessible to smaller specialist operators when they meet the required technical and commercial conditions. Future Procurement Opportunities Future procurement opportunities may arise from additional rolling stock maintenance requirements, fleet refurbishment, component replacement, technical inspections and specialist repair services. Operators with growing or ageing electric fleets are likely to require structured maintenance programmes to preserve vehicle availability. The option structure in this procurement may also create additional work during the contract lifecycle if Szybka Kolej Miejska exercises the rights specified in the tender. These potential requirements include P5 maintenance for four 19WEa vehicles, additional planned and unplanned work and expanded employee training. Suppliers should therefore monitor procurement pipelines for rolling stock maintenance as well as related technical services. Tracking CPV 50222000 and related railway maintenance classifications can help identify opportunities before contract notices reach the award stage. Opportunities for Suppliers Rail maintenance companies can position themselves for similar opportunities by developing strong capabilities in major vehicle inspections, repair execution, maintenance documentation and warranty support. Demonstrable ability to complete maintenance within defined timeframes can also be commercially important where availability is part of the evaluation. Suppliers should also consider developing formal training programmes for operator personnel. The Almere procurement is not relevant here; this Polish tender specifically shows that technical training can be integrated directly into a rolling stock maintenance contract, creating an additional service component for qualified maintenance providers. What Businesses Should Watch Businesses operating in Poland's rail maintenance sector should watch for procurements involving electric multiple units, P5 maintenance, fleet refurbishment and long term rolling stock servicing. The CPV code 50222000 provides a direct classification signal for repair and maintenance services of rolling stock. Suppliers should also pay attention to option clauses because the initial vehicle count may not represent the full potential technical scope. In this procurement, the basic requirement covers nine 35WEa vehicles while the option can introduce four 19WEa vehicles and additional maintenance and training activities. Another factor to monitor is the evaluation methodology. Where price represents a large proportion of the score, suppliers need to develop competitive commercial models while protecting their ability to deliver the required turnaround times and warranty commitments. PolandTenders.com Procurement Intelligence The Poland rail maintenance award provides a useful procurement intelligence signal because it combines a large contract value with a relatively narrow technical requirement. The procurement is focused on a defined fleet and maintenance level rather than a broad collection of railway services. This type of specification can create opportunities for specialist suppliers with targeted technical capabilities. The single tender received is also an important market observation. The notice does not provide an explanation for the number of participants, so no conclusion should be drawn about the reasons for the limited competition. However, suppliers monitoring this market can use the result to identify the technical and commercial characteristics of a procurement that attracted a successful SME bidder. The 85% price weighting means commercial preparation is particularly important for comparable opportunities. Suppliers should understand their workshop costs, labour requirements, component exposure, turnaround capacity and warranty liabilities before submitting bids for major maintenance programmes. The option structure also demonstrates why procurement intelligence should capture detailed tender specifications rather than only headline contract values. A contract advertised around nine vehicles can contain additional potential work involving another vehicle type, supplementary maintenance and training. Suppliers that identify these details early can prepare operational resources and partnerships more effectively. Future rolling stock maintenance procurement could increasingly combine technical servicing with workforce training, turnaround commitments, warranty requirements and optional fleet extensions. Monitoring these elements can help suppliers understand not only where procurement spending is occurring but also how contracting authorities are structuring their maintenance requirements. Supplier Takeaways Buyer: Szybka Kolej Miejska Sp. z o.o., Warsaw. Winner: Public Transport Service sp. z o.o. Contract value: PLN 386,301,960.20. Basic scope: P5 maintenance of nine 35WEa electric multiple units. Option: P5 maintenance of four 19WEa vehicles plus additional works and training. Duration: 930 days. Tenders received: 1. Price weighting: 85%. Repair completion time: 10% of the evaluation. Warranty: 5% of the evaluation. Main CPV: 50222000, Repair and maintenance services of rolling stock. Winner size: Micro, small or medium enterprise. Key Takeaways Poland has awarded a PLN 386.3 million rolling stock maintenance contract. The contract covers P5 maintenance of nine 35WEa electric multiple units. Public Transport Service sp. z o.o. won the single lot. The contract was concluded on 18 September 2026. The contract duration is 930 days with no renewal option. The procurement includes an option for four 19WEa vehicles. Additional optional maintenance and training activities can also be ordered. One tender was received and the successful bidder is classified as an SME. Price accounted for 85% of the award criteria. Quality criteria covered repair completion time and warranty. The procurement was conducted under Directive 2014/25/EU. Conclusion Poland's PLN 386.3 million award to Public Transport Service sp. z o.o. represents a significant investment in the maintenance of Szybka Kolej Miejska's electric rolling stock. The combination of P5 maintenance, optional work on 19WEa vehicles, staff training, repair turnaround and warranty requirements creates a technically focused procurement model with substantial implications for specialist rail maintenance suppliers. The award also highlights the importance of monitoring detailed procurement specifications, because option clauses and service requirements can significantly expand the commercial opportunity beyond the basic vehicle maintenance scope. Source: TED Contract or concession award notice 651772-2026, OJ S 183/2026, published 22 September 2026, Szybka Kolej Miejska Sp. z o.o.
View Details
Poland Awards Military Airfield Fertiliser Contracts to Blending and ADAR
21 Sep 2026
Standfirst Poland has awarded contracts for the supply of mineral fertilisers used to maintain turf surfaces at military airfields. The procurement, conducted by 3 Regionalna Baza Logistyczna in Kraków, was divided into 11 lots covering different fertiliser products. Blending Sp. z o.o. won five lots while ADAR Handl Nawozami Sztucznymi Sp. z o.o. won three lots, while Lots 9 to 11 closed without a winner. The TED notice reports PLN 207.86 million as the value of all contracts awarded in the notice, although the individual winning tender values disclosed for Lots 1 to 8 are substantially lower. Introduction Poland has completed a major multi lot procurement for mineral fertilisers intended to maintain turf surfaces at military airfields. The contract award notice, TED publication 648740 2026, was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 21 September 2026. The procurement was organised by 3 Regionalna Baza Logistyczna, a Polish public law body operating in the defence sector. The requirement covered 11 separate tasks, allowing suppliers to submit offers for any number of lots rather than requiring participation across the entire procurement. The products covered a range of fertiliser categories, including granular superphosphate, enriched superphosphate, potassium salt, ammonium nitrate, Polifoska 5, magnesium sulphate, granular fertiliser urea and other products. All lots used CPV 24440000, Miscellaneous fertilisers. Eight lots resulted in awarded contracts. Blending Sp. z o.o. won Lots 1, 2, 6, 7 and 8, while ADAR Handl Nawozami Sztucznymi Sp. z o.o. won Lots 3, 4 and 5. Lots 9, 10 and 11 received tenders but were closed without a winner because all submitted tenders were withdrawn or found inadmissible. Why This Contract Matters The procurement illustrates how defence organisations can require specialised agricultural and grounds maintenance supplies as part of broader military infrastructure management. Military airfields depend on maintained turf areas for operational and safety related requirements, making the availability of suitable fertiliser products a recurring procurement consideration. Rather than combining all products into a single contract, the Polish buyer separated the requirement into 11 lots based on individual fertiliser types. This structure allows suppliers with capabilities in particular product categories to participate without necessarily having to supply the entire range. The result also provides useful market intelligence because several lots attracted multiple electronic tenders. Lots 1, 2 and 6 received two tenders each, while Lots 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8 received three tenders each. The three unsuccessful lots are equally important from a procurement intelligence perspective. Lots 9, 10 and 11 each received three tenders but no contract was awarded because the submitted tenders were withdrawn or considered inadmissible. Contract Timeline The procurement followed an open procedure under the Polish Public Procurement Law. The previous procurement notice was numbered 294902 2026 and the internal identifier for the procedure was 81/2026/D. For Lots 3, 4 and 5, the successful suppliers were selected on 25 June 2026 and the contracts were concluded on 15 July 2026. For Lots 6, 7 and 8, the winners were also selected on 25 June 2026, with contracts concluded on 8 July 2026. For Lots 1 and 2, the winner was selected on 17 July 2026 and contracts were concluded on 28 July 2026. The delivery period for the awarded lots is 16 weeks from contract conclusion, subject to the notice conditions and a final deadline of 30 October 2026. Contract Overview The procurement covers the supply of mineral fertilisers for the maintenance of turf surfaces at military airfields in Poland. The buyer did not provide an option right and required suppliers to submit documentary evidence confirming that their proposed products met the specified requirements. The procedure was conducted as an open tender. Price was the sole award criterion, carrying 100 points for the lots covered by the notice. The procurement was not financed with European Union funds. It was covered by the Government Procurement Agreement and did not use a framework agreement or a dynamic purchasing system. Key Contract Details CountryPoland Contracting Authority3 Regionalna Baza Logistyczna ProcurementSupply of mineral fertilisers for maintaining turf surfaces at military airfields TED Notice648740 2026 PublicationOJ S 182/2026, 21 September 2026 Main CPV24440000, Miscellaneous fertilisers ProcedureOpen procedure Total lots11 Lots awarded1 to 8 Lots without winner9 to 11 Primary WinnerBlending Sp. z o.o., Lots 1, 2, 6, 7 and 8 Second WinnerADAR Handl Nawozami Sztucznymi Sp. z o.o., Lots 3, 4 and 5 Notice Reported Award ValuePLN 207,859,500 Award CriterionPrice, 100 points EU FundingNo GPA CoveredYes Framework AgreementNo Dynamic Purchasing SystemNo Review OrganisationPrezes Krajowej Izby Odwoławczej Project Scope The procurement covers mineral fertilisers required to maintain turf surfaces at military airfields. The buyer divided the requirement into 11 product specific tasks and allowed suppliers to submit offers for any number of tasks. Lot 1 covered granular superphosphate 19 percent. Lot 2 covered enriched superphosphate 40 percent. Lot 3 concerned potassium salt 40 percent while Lot 4 covered potassium salt 60 percent. Lot 5 concerned ammonium nitrate 34 percent. Lot 6 covered Polifoska 5 and Lot 7 covered magnesium sulphate. Lot 8 covered granular fertiliser urea 46 percent. Lots 9 to 11 covered different types of agricultural lime products. The procurement documents specified product requirements and required suppliers to provide evidence demonstrating compliance. The notice states that deliveries could not begin before 1 September 2026 for the relevant tasks and were required to be completed within 16 weeks of contract conclusion, subject to the stated final deadline. About the Contracting Authority 3 Regionalna Baza Logistyczna is the contracting authority responsible for this defence procurement. The organisation operates from ul. Montelupich 3 in Kraków and is identified in the notice as a public law body whose contracting activity relates to defence. The organisation also performs several procurement functions in this procedure, including providing procurement information, signing contracts, financing the contracts and executing payments. About the Organisations Involved 3 Regionalna Baza Logistyczna is the buyer and contracting organisation. Its public procurement section managed the procedure and its budget is identified as the source used to pay for the contracts. Blending Sp. z o.o. is one of the two successful suppliers. The company is classified as a medium sized economic operator and is based in Zduny, Poland. It won Lots 1, 2, 6, 7 and 8. ADAR Handl Nawozami Sztucznymi Sp. z o.o. is the second successful supplier. The company is classified as a medium sized economic operator and is based in Pakość, Poland. It won Lots 3, 4 and 5. Prezes Krajowej Izby Odwoławczej, representing the Krajowa Izba Odwoławcza, is identified as the review organisation for the procurement. The review body is based in Warsaw. Publications Office of the European Union is identified as the TED publication organisation associated with the notice. Procurement Analysis The open procedure created an opportunity for suppliers to compete across multiple product categories. Because suppliers could bid for any number of lots, the structure allowed companies to target product categories aligned with their commercial capabilities. Price was the sole award criterion, with a weighting of 100 points. This creates a procurement environment in which compliant suppliers compete primarily through price once the required technical and documentary conditions have been satisfied. Competition varied by lot. Lots 1, 2 and 6 attracted two tenders each while Lots 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8 attracted three tenders each. The notice also records that the received tenders were submitted electronically and that the participating tenders came from micro, small or medium sized tenderers. The results show that two medium sized suppliers captured all eight awarded lots. This concentration occurred despite the procurement being divided into multiple product categories and allowing participation in any number of tasks. Additional Procurement Facts The procurement is governed by Directive 2014/24/EU and the Polish Public Procurement Law. The buyer did not require a bid bond or performance security before contract signature. The procurement documents required suppliers to provide subject matter evidence demonstrating compliance with the buyer's technical requirements. The contracting authority also retained the possibility of supplementing missing or incomplete evidence under the applicable Polish procurement rules. The notice records no EU funding. It also states that there is no framework agreement and no dynamic purchasing system. The Government Procurement Agreement applies to the procurement. The buyer also included eligibility and exclusion requirements linked to Polish procurement law and restrictions concerning entities covered by specified sanctions and security related provisions. Market & Industry Perspective The award provides a useful view of a specialised segment of defence procurement in which the products themselves are conventional agricultural inputs but the end use is linked to military infrastructure. This creates a procurement market where product compliance, documentation and delivery capability can be as important as general fertiliser market participation. The lot based structure also demonstrates how public buyers can divide a broad procurement requirement into commercially distinct product categories. Such structures can create opportunities for suppliers that specialise in individual fertiliser products rather than maintaining a complete product portfolio. The participation of medium sized suppliers across the awarded lots indicates that defence procurement can include opportunities for companies that are not among the largest industrial groups. However, suppliers still need to meet the buyer's documentary and technical requirements. Economic Significance The notice reports PLN 207,859,500 as the value of all contracts awarded in the notice. At the same time, the individual winning tender values disclosed for Lots 1 to 8 are much smaller and together amount to approximately PLN 1.69 million. This difference is important for procurement data users. The published notice level value should be reported as stated, but individual tender values should not be artificially adjusted to make them match the aggregate figure. The discrepancy should therefore be treated as a data point requiring caution when using the notice for price benchmarking. Future Procurement Opportunities The procurement suggests continuing demand for maintenance supplies associated with military airfield infrastructure. Future opportunities may include repeat purchases of the same fertiliser categories or new requirements resulting from operational maintenance schedules. The three lots that closed without a winner may also be relevant for future procurement monitoring. Lots 9, 10 and 11 received three tenders each but no winner was selected because all tenders were withdrawn or found inadmissible. Future procurement activity may therefore provide opportunities for suppliers able to address the reasons for non award and submit fully compliant offers. Businesses should monitor subsequent notices from the same contracting authority for revised requirements or new procedures. Opportunities for Suppliers Fertiliser manufacturers, distributors and specialist agricultural suppliers can monitor Polish defence procurement for similar requirements. The current procurement demonstrates that suppliers do not necessarily need to cover the entire product range because bids could be submitted for any number of lots. Companies should also focus on documentation and compliance. The contracting authority specifically required evidence confirming that proposed products met its requirements. A commercially competitive price therefore needed to be accompanied by an offer satisfying the procurement conditions. Medium sized suppliers may find this type of procurement particularly relevant because the awarded contracts demonstrate participation by companies classified as medium sized economic operators. What Businesses Should Watch Suppliers should monitor the procurement activity of 3 Regionalna Baza Logistyczna and other Polish defence purchasing bodies for future supply requirements. CPV 24440000 can be used as one useful classification for identifying fertiliser procurement notices. Businesses should also monitor unsuccessful lots separately from awarded lots. A lot that receives several tenders but ends without an award can indicate a future procurement opportunity if the authority subsequently restarts the requirement. Price should remain an important consideration for suppliers targeting comparable procurements because the current notice used price as the sole award criterion. However, suppliers should first establish that their products and supporting documentation satisfy the technical requirements. Finally, companies using contract award data for market intelligence should distinguish between aggregate notice values and individual lot tender values. The current notice demonstrates why both levels of procurement data need to be reviewed before drawing pricing conclusions. PolandTenders.com Procurement Intelligence From a procurement intelligence perspective, this award illustrates a broader trend toward increasingly granular public procurement. Instead of buying a broad category of fertiliser through one contract, the Polish defence buyer divided the requirement into 11 product specific lots. This creates a more detailed view of supplier capability, competition and pricing across individual product categories. The strategic significance of the procurement is also connected to the relationship between ordinary commercial products and specialised government end users. Fertilisers are widely traded products, but supplying a defence organisation introduces additional requirements relating to technical documentation, eligibility, delivery and procurement compliance. For suppliers, one of the most important lessons is the value of lot level tender monitoring. A business that monitors only the overall procurement title may overlook the fact that its specific product category is being procured separately. CPV based monitoring combined with product keyword intelligence can therefore provide a more precise picture of opportunities. The results also demonstrate the importance of analysing unsuccessful tenders. Lots 9, 10 and 11 attracted three tenders each but did not result in awards. For procurement intelligence purposes, these lots should not simply be treated as closed opportunities. They can remain relevant indicators of unresolved buyer demand, particularly if the authority later publishes a new procurement. Future contracts in this market could continue to use multiple lots to separate fertiliser types and encourage specialist participation. Suppliers that maintain strong product documentation, understand Polish public procurement requirements and track buyer specific procurement patterns can use award history to identify recurring demand and prepare earlier for subsequent competitions. Supplier Takeaways 3 Regionalna Baza Logistyczna procured mineral fertilisers for maintaining turf surfaces at Polish military airfields. The procurement was divided into 11 lots. Suppliers could submit offers for any number of lots. Blending Sp. z o.o. won Lots 1, 2, 6, 7 and 8. ADAR Handl Nawozami Sztucznymi Sp. z o.o. won Lots 3, 4 and 5. Lots 9, 10 and 11 closed without a winner. Price was the sole award criterion with a weighting of 100 points. Lots 1, 2 and 6 received two tenders each. Lots 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8 received three tenders each. The awarded suppliers were classified as medium sized economic operators. No EU funds were used. The procurement was covered by the GPA. No framework agreement or dynamic purchasing system was used. Product compliance documentation was an important part of the procurement requirements. Key Takeaways Country: Poland Buyer: 3 Regionalna Baza Logistyczna Sector: Defence and military infrastructure maintenance Requirement: Mineral fertilisers for military airfield turf surfaces CPV: 24440000, Miscellaneous fertilisers Procedure: Open procedure Total lots: 11 Lots awarded: 8 Lots without winner: 3 Blending winning lots: 1, 2, 6, 7 and 8 ADAR winning lots: 3, 4 and 5 Notice reported award value: PLN 207,859,500 Award criterion: Price, 100 points EU funding: No GPA: Yes Framework agreement: No DPS: No Review body: Prezes Krajowej Izby Odwoławczej Conclusion Poland's award of mineral fertiliser supply contracts for military airfields demonstrates how defence procurement can generate opportunities for specialised suppliers of conventional commercial products. The eight awarded lots were divided between Blending Sp. z o.o. and ADAR Handl Nawozami Sztucznymi Sp. z o.o., while three additional lots closed without a winner. For suppliers, the procurement highlights the importance of lot level opportunity tracking, technical compliance, competitive pricing and monitoring of unsuccessful procurement lots for potential future opportunities. Source: TED Contract or Concession Award Notice 648740 2026, Poland, OJ S 182/2026, published 21 September 2026.
View Details
Poland Awards PLN 224.63 Million Warsaw Municipal Waste Management Contracts to ENERIS
18 Sep 2026
Standfirst: Poland has awarded three municipal waste management contracts covering up to 300,000 Mg of non hazardous municipal waste from Warsaw to ENERIS Ekologiczne Centrum Utylizacji Sp. z o.o. The contracts cover Lots 3, 4 and 5 under a procurement organised by Miejskie Przedsiębiorstwo Oczyszczania w m. st. Warszawie sp. z o.o. The combined value of the contracts is PLN 224.625 million including the stated renewals, while the value without renewals is PLN 179.7 million. Each lot provides for an initial 24 month period with one possible six month renewal. Introduction Miejskie Przedsiębiorstwo Oczyszczania w m. st. Warszawie sp. z o.o. has awarded three contracts for the management of municipal waste originating from the territory of the City of Warsaw. The procurement covers waste classified under code 20 03 01 and was divided into five tasks, with the published result covering Lots 3, 4 and 5. ENERIS Ekologiczne Centrum Utylizacji Sp. z o.o. was selected for all three lots. Each lot has a planned maximum quantity of 100,000 Mg and a declared minimum quantity of 50,000 Mg. The contracts have an initial duration of 24 months and may be renewed once for an additional six months. The award notice records a total value of PLN 224.625 million including renewals and specifically states that the value without renewals is PLN 179.7 million. The notice is also a change notice correcting the general information section of the earlier award publication. Why This Contract Matters The procurement is significant because it concerns the treatment and management of a substantial volume of municipal waste generated within Warsaw. The overall procurement was designed around a planned maximum of 500,000 Mg divided across five tasks, with the present result confirming awards for three of those tasks. Lots 3, 4 and 5 each provide for a maximum planned quantity of 100,000 Mg. The structure also provides procurement visibility into how a major urban waste requirement can be divided into separate service lots. The arrangement gives the contracting authority separate contractual capacity while establishing minimum quantities for each awarded task. This approach can help align contracted waste management capacity with actual waste generation levels and operational requirements. Contract Timeline The procurement used an open procedure and was identified under internal reference RZP.27.17.2026.KB. The winners for Lot 3 and Lot 5 were selected on 10 August 2026, while the winner for Lot 4 was selected on 5 August 2026. Contracts for Lots 3 and 5 were concluded on 21 August 2026 and the Lot 4 contract was concluded on 18 August 2026. The TED change notice was dispatched on 17 September 2026 and published on 18 September 2026 under publication number 645608 2026. The change was identified as a buyer correction relating to information included in the general information section. Contract Overview The procurement concerns services for the management of municipal waste originating from Warsaw. The main CPV classification is 90513000, covering non hazardous refuse and waste treatment and disposal services. The overall procurement was divided into five tasks with a planned maximum of 100,000 Mg for each task. The present award notice records contracts for Lots 3, 4 and 5. ENERIS Ekologiczne Centrum Utylizacji Sp. z o.o. is the winner for all three lots. The award criterion was cost, with the cost of the service carrying 100 percent of the stated award weighting for each lot. Key Contract Details Contracting AuthorityMiejskie Przedsiębiorstwo Oczyszczania w m. st. Warszawie sp. z o.o. ProcurementManagement of municipal waste originating from the territory of Warsaw CountryPoland LocationWarsaw, Poland Main CPV90513000, Non hazardous refuse and waste treatment and disposal services Total Award Value Including RenewalsPLN 224,625,000 Total Award Value Without RenewalsPLN 179,700,000 Lots AwardedLOT 0003, LOT 0004 and LOT 0005 WinnerENERIS Ekologiczne Centrum Utylizacji Sp. z o.o. Maximum Planned Quantity per Lot100,000 Mg Minimum Declared Quantity per Lot50,000 Mg Initial Duration24 months Maximum Renewals1 Renewal Period6 months Award CriterionCost of service, 100 percent ProcedureOpen procedure EU FundingNo GPA CoverageNo Project Scope The procurement covers the management of municipal waste originating from Warsaw. The overall procurement planned a maximum quantity of 500,000 Mg divided across five tasks. Lots 3, 4 and 5 each cover a planned maximum of 100,000 Mg of municipal waste with waste code 20 03 01. For each of the three awarded lots, the contracting authority declared that the order would be implemented to a minimum quantity of 50,000 Mg. At the same time, the notice states that the actual quantity delivered for management depends on the amount of waste generated by Warsaw residents and other factors specified in the procurement documentation. The notice also makes clear that the contractor does not have a claim for compensation if the quantity of waste delivered during the contract period is lower than the planned maximum. The procurement location is associated with Warsaw, while the actual installation and transfer station are to be identified by the contractor in its offer, subject to changes permitted under the contract. About the Contracting Authority Miejskie Przedsiębiorstwo Oczyszczania w m. st. Warszawie sp. z o.o. is the buyer and the organisation responsible for the procurement. The contracting authority is classified as a body governed by public law and its stated activity is housing and community amenities. Its procurement department is located at ul. Obozowa 43 in Warsaw. About the Organisations Involved Miejskie Przedsiębiorstwo Oczyszczania w m. st. Warszawie sp. z o.o. is the contracting authority and buyer for the municipal waste management procurement. The organisation's public procurement department handled the procurement and the notice provides its Warsaw address and procurement contact details. ENERIS Ekologiczne Centrum Utylizacji Sp. z o.o. is the successful tenderer and winner of Lots 3, 4 and 5. The TED notice classifies the economic operator as large. The organisation is registered in Poland and has its listed address in Rusko, Jaroszów, within the Wałbrzyski area. Krajowa Izba Odwoławcza is identified as the review organisation and as the organisation providing further information on review procedures. It is based in Warsaw and handles procurement review matters specified in the notice. Publications Office of the European Union is identified as the TED eSender responsible for transmitting the notice through the European Union's procurement publication system. Procurement Analysis The award is structured around three separate lots that share substantially the same service description, quantity structure and duration. Each lot has a maximum planned quantity of 100,000 Mg and a minimum declared quantity of 50,000 Mg. The three lots therefore represent a combined planned maximum of 300,000 Mg and a combined declared minimum of 150,000 Mg. Cost was the sole stated award criterion for each of the three lots, with the cost of the service receiving a 100 percent weighting. This makes price or service cost the central documented selection factor in the result notice. The notice records four tenders for Lot 3, two tenders for Lot 4 and three tenders for Lot 5. All three winning tenders were submitted electronically and were ranked. ENERIS did not indicate subcontracting for the awarded lots and the winning offers were not variants. The tender values reported in the award results were PLN 74.875 million for each lot including the stated renewal provision. Additional Procurement Facts The award notice records PLN 224.625 million as the value of all contracts awarded in the notice including renewals. However, the contracting authority added a correction explaining that the value without renewals is PLN 179.7 million. For each individual lot, the value including the renewal provision is PLN 74.875 million while the value without renewals is PLN 59.9 million. The procurement is not financed with European Union funds and is not covered by the Government Procurement Agreement. No framework agreement or dynamic purchasing system is used. The contract documentation also requires the contractor and or subcontractors to employ relevant personnel under employment contracts in accordance with Polish labour law. Market & Industry Perspective The Warsaw procurement demonstrates the scale of municipal waste management requirements in a major European capital. Large urban waste streams create continuing demand for collection interfaces, transfer arrangements, treatment capacity and compliant disposal or recovery services. Procurement divided into multiple lots can allow authorities to structure capacity around separate contractual tasks. The use of a maximum quantity alongside a declared minimum is also relevant to suppliers. Actual waste volumes can fluctuate according to population behaviour, waste generation patterns and other operational factors. Suppliers therefore need to account for volume variability when planning facilities, transportation arrangements, staffing and other resources required to deliver waste treatment services. The procurement also shows the importance of cost competitiveness in this market. With service cost carrying the full award weighting, suppliers participating in similar tenders need to understand the relationship between treatment capacity, operating costs and the pricing structure required by the contracting authority. Economic Significance The three awarded contracts have a combined value of PLN 224.625 million including renewals. Without the renewal provisions, the combined value is PLN 179.7 million. This represents a substantial municipal procurement programme covering up to 300,000 Mg of waste across the three awarded tasks. The contracts can also support continuity in waste treatment capacity for Warsaw over their initial 24 month periods. The potential six month renewal for each lot provides an additional contractual period subject to the terms specified in the procurement documentation. Future Procurement Opportunities The procurement notice indicates that the wider Warsaw requirement was divided into five tasks, while the present result concerns Lots 3, 4 and 5. Businesses monitoring the market should therefore distinguish this award notice from future procurement activity rather than assuming that all five tasks are represented by the present result. Future opportunities in Poland may arise across municipal waste treatment, waste transfer, recycling, recovery and disposal services. Suppliers should monitor procurement notices using relevant CPV classifications such as 90513000 and examine individual contracting authority requirements because quantities, treatment standards and commercial structures can differ between municipalities. Companies should also monitor renewals and contract completion periods. A procurement with an initial 24 month term and possible six month renewal can create a defined future point at which authorities reassess capacity or prepare subsequent procurement arrangements. Opportunities for Suppliers The award provides several practical signals for suppliers seeking municipal waste management contracts in Poland. Companies should maintain demonstrable treatment capacity, operational readiness and cost structures that can support large planned volumes while accommodating fluctuations in actual quantities. Because cost was weighted at 100 percent in each awarded lot, suppliers should pay close attention to the pricing methodology in tender documentation. Operational efficiency, facility utilisation and logistics planning can all affect the commercial position of waste management companies participating in price focused procurements. What Businesses Should Watch Waste management companies should monitor municipal procurement programmes where requirements are divided into multiple lots. A large overall requirement may create several individual contracting opportunities with separate quantities, contract terms and award outcomes. Businesses should also examine whether procurement documents establish minimum and maximum quantities. In this case, each awarded lot has a minimum declared quantity of 50,000 Mg and a maximum planned quantity of 100,000 Mg. The difference is important when estimating potential workload and revenue because the maximum planned quantity is not presented as a guaranteed delivery volume. Suppliers should also watch employment requirements and operational compliance conditions. The notice requires relevant personnel to be employed under employment contracts in accordance with Polish labour law, with detailed requirements set out in the proposed contract provisions and description of the subject matter. PolandTenders.com Procurement Intelligence From a procurement intelligence perspective, this award demonstrates why waste management opportunities should be analysed at the lot level rather than only at the headline procurement level. The overall Warsaw requirement was planned at 500,000 Mg across five tasks, yet the present award confirms three specific lots. Tracking individual lots allows suppliers to identify exactly which requirements have been awarded, which commercial values apply and which parts of the wider procurement remain relevant for future monitoring. The result also provides useful intelligence about the commercial structure of municipal waste services. The contracting authority used cost as the sole stated award criterion for the three awarded lots. This indicates that suppliers targeting comparable requirements need to understand not only technical eligibility but also the economics of providing waste treatment services at the required scale. Another important supplier lesson is the difference between planned capacity and guaranteed workload. Each awarded lot has a maximum planned quantity of 100,000 Mg but a declared minimum of 50,000 Mg. The notice expressly states that actual quantities depend on waste generated by Warsaw residents and other factors. Procurement intelligence should therefore capture minimum quantities, maximum quantities and renewal provisions separately rather than treating the maximum figure as guaranteed business. The award to the same organisation across Lots 3, 4 and 5 also provides a useful historical supplier signal. ENERIS Ekologiczne Centrum Utylizacji Sp. z o.o. appears in the notice as the winner of all three awarded lots. Such historical award information can help businesses map supplier participation across municipal waste procurement and identify organisations with experience in specific service categories. For future positioning, suppliers can use procurement history to identify contracting authorities, recurring CPV categories, typical lot sizes, quantity ranges and award criteria. Combining current tenders with historical awards can provide a more complete view of where municipal waste treatment demand is recurring and how authorities structure their purchasing requirements. Supplier Takeaways ENERIS Ekologiczne Centrum Utylizacji Sp. z o.o. won Lots 3, 4 and 5. Each awarded lot has a planned maximum quantity of 100,000 Mg. Each lot has a declared minimum quantity of 50,000 Mg. The three awarded lots therefore represent a combined planned maximum of 300,000 Mg. The combined contract value including renewals is PLN 224.625 million. The combined value without renewals is PLN 179.7 million. Each lot has an initial duration of 24 months. Each lot can be renewed once for six additional months. Cost carried 100 percent of the stated award weighting for each lot. Lot 3 received four tenders, Lot 4 received two tenders and Lot 5 received three tenders. The winning tenders did not include subcontracting. The procurement was not financed with EU funds. Key Takeaways Warsaw has awarded three municipal waste management contracts under a five task procurement. The contracting authority is Miejskie Przedsiębiorstwo Oczyszczania w m. st. Warszawie sp. z o.o. The successful supplier is ENERIS Ekologiczne Centrum Utylizacji Sp. z o.o. The awarded lots are LOT 0003, LOT 0004 and LOT 0005. The main CPV classification is 90513000. The contracts concern non hazardous municipal waste classified under code 20 03 01. The value including renewals is PLN 224.625 million. The value without renewals is PLN 179.7 million. The maximum planned quantity across the three awarded lots is 300,000 Mg. The declared minimum quantity across the three awarded lots is 150,000 Mg. Contracts for Lots 3 and 5 were concluded on 21 August 2026 and the Lot 4 contract was concluded on 18 August 2026. The notice was published as a change notice correcting the general information section of the previous publication. Conclusion The Warsaw municipal waste procurement has resulted in three contracts worth PLN 224.625 million including renewals being awarded to ENERIS Ekologiczne Centrum Utylizacji Sp. z o.o. for Lots 3, 4 and 5. The contracts cover substantial waste management volumes and provide an initial 24 month service period with a possible six month renewal. The procurement offers useful insight into the scale, lot structure, quantity conditions and cost focused evaluation approach used for municipal waste management services in Warsaw. Source: TED, Contract or concession award notice 645608 2026, OJ S 181/2026, published 18 September 2026.
View Details